Scenic View Protection
Contents
- Introduction
- Reference Sources - State Statutes
- City and County Ordinance Provisions
- Other Documents
Introduction
Cities and counties may consider aesthetics in regulating the use of land. The legal basis for aesthetic zoning has been established in caselaw for many years. The Washington State Court of Appeals affirmed this by stating that "aesthetic standards are an appropriate component of land use governance." Anderson v. Issaquah, 70 Wn. App. 64, 82 (1993). Zoning for aesthetics includes view protection regulations, historic preservation ordinances, design review standards, sign controls, and tree protection measures. MRSC recommends that the city or county support any height restrictions or other view protection provisions on as many grounds as possible, since it is not clear in this state if aesthetics alone will justify a view protection ordinance.
Reference Sources - State Statutes
- RCW 90.58.320 - Height limitation respecting permits. Statutory basis for protection of views on shorelines of the state.
City and County Ordinance Provisions
- Aberdeen Municipal Code Section 16.20.110 - Scenic view and vista regulations
- Clark County Code Ch. 40.240 - Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Districts (see especially Sections40.280.800 and 40.280.810)
- Clyde Hill Municipal Code Ch. 17.38 (
) - View Obstruction and Tree Removal
- Edmonds Community Development Code Ch. 20.11 - General Design Review
- Everett Municipal Code Ch. 16.20.040 - Billboard location restrictions
- Friday Harbor Municipal Code Section 17.32.060 – View protection overlay district (in Title 17
)
- Kent Municipal Code Section 15.08.060 - View corridor protection regulations on hillside development
- Klickitat County Code Ch. 2.21 (
) - View Protection District
- La Conner Municipal Code Sections 10.10.225 – 10.10.235 (
) - regarding view protection
- Lake Forest Park Municipal Code Section 16.06.200 (
) - Public view protection
- Olympia Unified Development Code Ch. 18.10 - Height Overlay Districts and Section 18.06.100
- Port Orchard Municipal Code Section 16.20.700 - View Protection Overlay District
- Port Townsend Municipal Code Ch. 17.28 - Special Height Overlay District
- Redmond Zoning Code Ch. 21.42 - Public View Corridors and Gateways
- San Juan County Code Section 18.50.140 - View protection
- Seattle Land Use Code Ch. 23.60.162 - View Corridors
- Spokane Municipal Code Ch. 17C.170 - Special Height Overlay Districts
- Tacoma Municipal Code Section 13.06.555 - View-Sensitive Overlay Zoning District, and Sections 13.10.040(G) and 13.10.110(G)(1)(a)(3) (in Title 13
).
Out-of-State Code Provisions
- Boulder County, CO - Land Use Code Ch. 4-200 (
) - View Protection Overlay District
- Cotati, CA - Municipal Code Ch. 17.53 - Hillside and Ridgeline Development -
- Castle Rock, CO - Municipal Code Ch. 17.14 (
) - Skyline/Ridgeline Protection Regulations
- Lafayette Township, NJ - Ordinance 2010-03 regarding Ridgeline and Hillside Viewshed Protection Zone
- Los Gatos, CA Hillside Development Standards & Guidelines: Compliance Checklist (
)
- Oakland, CA - Municipal Code Title 17 - Planning (see Section 17.90 - S-10 - Scenic Route Combining Zone Regulations).
Other Documents
- "Aesthetic Regulation - Legal Issues," by Bob Meinig, Municipal Research News, September 1993
- Hillside and Ridgetop Regulations: A Recommendation for Asheville (
), Asheville, NC, 2005
- Scenic Easements and View Protection, Scenic America
- View Protection Activities, City of Seattle.
Related MRSC Resources
MRSC Index – Preservation of scenic views, view protection, view preservation

