GMA Plan/Development Regulations Updates
Contents
- Introduction
- GMA Update Background Information
- Local Plan and Critical Area Update Programs
- Ordinances Adopting Comprehensive Plan Updates
- Annual (or Periodic) Comprehensive Plan Amendments/Updates
- Comprehensive Plan Update Work Program & Process Examples
- Specific Update Topics Related to Recent Legislation or Current Issues
- Links to Other Related Websites
Introduction
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that each Washington city and county establish a public participation program and procedures for amendments, updates and revisions of comprehensive plans and development regulations. With some exceptions, proposed amendments or updates may be considered no more frequently than once every year and must be considered concurrently, so that the cumulative effects may be evaluated.
Each Washington city and county must periodically review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations - every eight years - to ensure that they comply with the GMA, as per the schedule provided in RCW 36.70A.130. Cities and counties planning under RCW 36.70A.040 (fully planning cities and counties) must complete such a periodic update for their entire comprehensive plan and development regulations. All counties and cities, including those not fully planning under the GMA, are required to review and, if necessary, amend their policies and development regulations regarding critical areas and natural resource lands. Critical areas ordinances must incorporate requirements for use of best available science and give special consideration to anadromous fisheries - see information on Critical Areas and Best Available Science.
ESHB 1478 (effective July 22, 2011) extends the time between mandated growth management plan/development regulation and shoreline plan updates to every eight years, and reallocates review and revision years for some jurisdictions. The first bloc of counties and cities must complete review and revision requirements by June 30, 2015, rather than December 1, 2014. An additional two years for meeting the review and revision requirements is granted to smaller and slow growing counties and cities that meet certain criteria. County reviews of designated urban growth areas (UGAs) must also be completed according to this schedule, and evaluation requirements for the buildable lands program must be completed by counties and cities one year before the applicable review and revision deadline. The deadline and extension provisions are to be codified in RCW 36.70A.130 (3), (4), (5) and (6).
In addition, RCW 36.70A.130(3), as amended by ESHB 1478, requires counties and cities to review, according to the schedules established in RCW 36.70A.130(5), designated UGAs, the densities permitted within each UGA, and the nature of development that has occurred. UGAs and comprehensive plans are to be revised to accommodate the urban growth projected for the succeeding twenty-year period.
A jurisdiction may complete the periodic update process before its deadline. The deadline for its next periodic update would still remain eight years from the original deadline established in the GMA. For example, if a jurisdiction has an update deadline of June 30, 2015, but it completes its update in 2012, then it would not be subject to another required periodic update until 2023.
For the update schedule for all counties, see the GMA Update Schedule Map, on the Department of Commerce Website.
RCW 90.58.080 provides a timetable of deadlines by which local governments must complete or amend their shoreline master program to be consistent with state guidelines. Beginning June 30, 2019, each county, and the cities within each county, must review and revise their shoreline master programs on an eight-year cycle, rather than the current seven-year cycle, as provided by ESHB 1478 (to be codified as RCW 90.58.080 (4)(a)). The Department of Ecology is required to strive to achieve final action on a submitted master program within 180 days of receipt and to post an annual assessment of its own performance on its website.
The Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development) has prepared information on plan updates. Please see the Department's webpage: Growth Management Act Periodic Update. This webpage includes a link to a very useful guidebook on completing the periodic update: the “Keeping Your Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations Current,” revised June, 2011. Guidebook appendices include checklists, sample work programs, resolutions/ordinances and other helpful aids. Appendix E of this guidebook includes a list of amendments to GMA that should help alert local jurisdictions to corresponding amendments that may be needed in local comprehensive plans to maintain consistency to GMA. The same web page includes a link to the webinar: Growth Management Periodic Update Grant Application Webinar.
GMA Update Background Information
- Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development) webpage Growth Management Act Periodic Update - Includes a link to a very useful guidebook on completing the periodic update: the “Keeping Your Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations Current,” revised June, 2011. It also includes updated checklists and good example documents for plan updates.
- Summary of ESHB 1478 (Final Bill Report) - Provides local governments with more time to meet GMA plan, development regulation, and shoreline program updates, and buildable land report requirements
- GMA Update: Issues To Consider When Reviewing Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations, Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly CTED)
- Map of Counties Planning Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly CTED)
Local Plan and Critical Area Update Programs
Cities
- Camas Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal to Serve Growth through 2023, presentation to City Council, 05/27/2003 - Summary of process, key elements of zoning proposal
- Snohomish County Unified Development Code (UDC) Update Project, 2010
- Lake Forest Park Comprehensive Plan and Revision Process - Includes sensitive areas ordinance
- Mercer Island 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
- Redmond Ordinance No. 2259 - Updates critical areas regulations and incorporates best available science
- Seattle Comprehensive Plan: 10 Year Update - Includes public involvement process, related resources
- Summer Comprehensive Plan Introduction (
), 12/2010 - See “Public Participation” - “2004 Comprehensive Plan Update,” “Plan Documents,” and “Related Documents” sections - Interesting participation strategy included focus groups, community survey, business survey, and bus tour/critique of recent projects
- Tacoma 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update
- Sultan 2011 Plan Update, and Draft Comprehensive Plan Information
Counties
- Whatcom County 2031 - Both a review and update of the Comprehensive Plan and 10-year review of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs); includes Public Involvement Plan, and Final Questionnaire Summary
- Clallam County 2004 GMA Evaluation and Update - Project reports, draft documents, public participation schedule
- Clallam County Public Participation Plan (
), 2004 Growth Management Act Update
- Jefferson County 2004 Update Comprehensive Plan Review
- Jefferson County Critical Areas - Includes BAS review white paper and shorelines issues
Ordinances Adopting Comprehensive Plan Updates
- Mercer Island Ordinance No. 05C-05 (
)
- Seattle Ordinance No. 121701, 2004
- Jefferson County Ordinance No. 17-1213-04 (
) - Amending comprehensive plan and development regulations to comply with seven-year update requirement
- Archive: 2004 King County Comprehensive Plan Update
- Kitsap County Ordinance No. 370-2006 (
)
Annual (or Periodic) Comprehensive Plan Amendments/Updates
- Mukilteo 2011 Comprehensive Plan Update
- Year 2009 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and Regulatory Amendment Process - Plan amendment process and timeline
- Kitsap County Resolution 032-2011: Final 2011 Docket
- Redmond Amending the Comprehensive Plan
- Sammamish 2008 Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendments
- Sammamish 2006 Comprehensive Plan Open House
- Covington Updating the Comprehensive Plan, and Covington 2011 Comp Plan Amendment Docket Packet - Including 2011 comprehensive plan amendment docket instructions and guidelines
- Clark County Ordinance No. 2010-12-12
Comprehensive Plan Update Work Program & Process Examples
- Newcastle Comprehensive Plan Scope of Work: Revisions of Scope for Phase 3, 11/01/2001
- Jefferson County Ordinance No. 55-03 (
) - Updating population projections and allocations
- Draft 2002 GMA Grant Scope of Work Examples, provided by Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly CTED):
Specific Update Topics Related to Recent Legislation or Current Issues
- Critical Areas, MRSC - Webpage that includes critical area ordinance update programs
- Best Available Science, MRSC - All counties and cities must include the best available science in developing critical areas policies and development regulations.
- Endangered Species - Salmon and Bull Trout, MRSC
- SEPA, MRSC
- Promotion of Physical Activity and Pedestrian & Bicycle Sub-Element - Additions to land use and transportation elements, as required by ESSB 5186
- Siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities, MRSC - RCW 36.70A.200; all counties and cities were required to amend policies and development regulations to establish a process by September 1, 2002.
- Manufactured Housing Location and Design, MRSC - Consistent with legislation effective July 1, 2005; cities and counties must regulate manufactured homes built to federal manufactured housing construction standards no differently than they regulate other types of homes.
- New Mandatory Parks Element - A mandatory requirement for a park and recreation element was added to the required GMA comprehensive plan elements during the 2002 legislative session. The requirement may be found at RCW 36.70A.070(8) & (9). Although new or amended elements are to be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130, that requirement is postponed until adequate state funding is available. See the MRSC Parks and Recreation webpage.
- New Mandatory Economic Development Element - A mandatory requirement for an economic development element was added to the required GMA comprehensive plan elements during the 2002 legislative session. The requirement may be found at RCW 36.70A.070(7) and (9). Although new or amended elements are to be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130, that requirement is postponed until adequate state funding is available. See the MRSC Planning for Economic Development webpage.
Links to Other Related Websites
- Critical Areas and Best Available Science Information page, Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services
- Population Information for Growth Management, State of Washington Office of Financial Management
- Best Available Science for Wetlands, Department of Ecology
Related MRSC Resources
MRSC Index – Sensitive areas, critical areas, Best Available Science, BAS
MRSC Index – Comprehensive land use plans and comprehensive planning
MRSC Index – Comprehensive land use plans and amendments for Washington cities
MRSC Index – Comprehensive land use plans and amendments for Washington counties
MRSC Index – Growth management, Growth Management Act

