scenic picture from Washington state
SubjectsPersonnel › Personnel Performance Evaluations
Reviewed 07/2014

Personnel Performance Evaluations

Contents

Introduction

Doing a good job is important both to employers and employees.

For the employing government, if its employees perform their work well, it is better able to maintain or improve the public's perception of its operation, it can accomplish its goals more efficiently and, possibly, with less expense, and it may be able to take on new tasks without adding additional staff or budgetary commitment.

For an employee, doing a good job helps create job satisfaction, may allow for career advancement, and may trigger higher wages or benefits. But how does one know whether he or she is going a good job? Is the employee meeting the goals and duties of the position? Or is poor performance placing the employee's continued employment at risk?

Personnel performance evaluations, if made on a continuing basis, allow the employer and the employee an opportunity to see how things are going, determine if there are problems that can be fixed, and set out goals for the upcoming year (or months). This page provides both information regarding why and how to perform performance evaluations as well as sample forms that can be used to assist the process.

Articles

The following articles discuss why performance evaluations should be performed and provide insight as to how such evaluations should be performed.

Forms and Policies

The following are forms that could be used in making performance evaluations; the materials also offer suggestions and criteria to help prepare the evaluations.

Washington

Out-of-State

  • Dallas County Non-exempt Personnel Performance Evaluation form
  • District of Columbia Performance Management, Office of Personnel - Performance management guidance
  • Tennessee Performance Evaluation, prepared by the Department of Human Resources - A very detailed resource that provides ideas and guidance for preparing for and conducting a job performance evaluation; although the document relates specifically to Tennessee, it should be useful for other governments.
  • University of California, Berkeley Performance Management Forms, prepared by the Human Resources Department - While these forms relate to employees in a university setting, most could easily be revised to be useful for local governments. The site also links to materials that are helpful to both supervisors and employees in preparation for the evaluation process.
  • University of Georgia Classified Employee Performance Assessment, 07/2008 - This form was prepared by the university, but it could easily be structured to apply to virtually any job position.
  • Wright State University (Dayton, Ohio) The Narrative Performance Appraisal, revised 01/2011 - An excellent source of suggestions and guidelines for evaluating the performance of employees

Need more information?

Feel free to Ask MRSC. Washington cities, counties, and our contract partners can call or email MRSC for more information and advice - free of charge.