Click here to skip to main content.
scenic picture from Washington state
RESEARCH TOOLSMRSC Index › Planning - Land use application procedures, permit processing, development permits, projects in multiple jurisdictions

MRSC Index A topical index to MRSC's information resources.

Planning: PL 2.1110 - Land use application procedures, permit processing, development permits, projects in multiple jurisdictions

Expand Section Electronic Documents (12 Results)

  1. Resolution No. 09-010 - Allows time extensions for approved building permits and preliminary short and long plats
    Ordinance | Document Date: 7/09
    Jurisdiction: SeaTac

  2. Resolution No. 2009-08-07 - Amends ยง 40.500.010 to extend certain land use approvals for up to twelve months
    Ordinance | Document Date: 8/09
    Jurisdiction: Clark County

  3. Ordinance No. 2029 - Temporarily revises time periods relating to development applications and approved land use actions and construction permits
    Ordinance | Document Date: 7/09
    Jurisdiction: Bothell

  4. Ordinance No. 07-547 - Establishes the city center planned action
    Ordinance | Document Date: 2/07
    Jurisdiction: Federal Way

  5. Ordinance No. 3608 - Establishes a planned action for Kent Station SEIS
    Ordinance | Document Date: 7/02
    Jurisdiction: Kent

  6. Ordinance No. 06-093 - Amends Sections 30.70.045; 30.70.050; table 30.70.050(3); 30.41a.640; and 30.66b.180, relating to public notice provisions; improves customer access to project information and significant cost savings; post card notices
    Ordinance | Document Date: 11/06
    Jurisdiction: Snohomish County

  7. Interlocal agreement between Clark County and the city of Vancouver relating to community development department services for newly annexed area
    Contracts
    Jurisdiction: Vancouver, Clark County

  8. Request for proposals for application software package to support the city's land development projects and permits functions
    RFP | Document Date: 12/99
    Sumner

  9. Ordinance No. 893 - Adds Section 14.30.140, diligent pursuit of project permit applications required
    Ordinance | Document Date: 11/01
    Jurisdiction: Snoqualmie

  10. Ordinance No. 02-026 - Amends Chs. 2.01, 2.68, 19A.30, 20.02 and 20.26 relating to delegation of authority to accept conveyances of real property
    Ordinance | Document Date: 7/02
    Jurisdiction: Snohomish County

  11. Ordinance No. 2000-213 - Relating to the City's Administrative Procedures
    Ordinance | Document Date: 3/7/00
    Newcastle

  12. Ordinance No. 1088 - Amends zoning code to streamline permitting procedures
    Ordinance | Document Date: 10/03
    Mukilteo

Expand Section Paper Documents (6 Results)

  1. Ordinance No. 2029 - Temporarily revises time periods relating to development applications and approved land use actions and construction permits
    Request this document | Document Date: 7/09
    Jurisdiction: Bothell

  2. "Site visits: purpose, planning and practice," by Stuart Meck. Zoning Practice, February 2005
    Request this document | Document Date: 2/05

  3. "Really fixing your development review process: going beyond cosmetic improvements," by Gerald Newfarmer, Amy Cohen Paul and Rebekka Hosken. Public Management, July 2003, pp. 16-20
    Request this document | Document Date: 7/03

  4. "The development review process: a means to a noble and greater end," by James von Hemert. Zoning Practice, January 2005
    Request this document | Document Date: 1/05

  5. Ordinance No. 204 - Adopts interlocal agreement between Shoreline and King County relating to the processing of building permits and land use applications
    Request this document | Document Date: 07/99
    Jurisdiction: Shoreline, King County

  6. Ordinance 11-05 - Adds Ch.20.01, administration of land use and zoning applications and development regulations
    Request this document | Document Date: 5/05
    Jurisdiction: Buckley

Expand Section MRSC Library Catalog Documents

Expand Section Featured Inquiries (3 Results)

  1. Is there any penalty if a city or county fails to send out a notice of completeness with respect to a project permit application?

    RCW 36.70B.070(1) requires local governments fully planning under the Growth Management Act to send or provide in person a notice of completeness (or one stating that the application is incomplete and what is required to make it complete) within 28 days after receiving a project permit application. The "penalty" for failure to comply with this requirement is that the application will be "deemed complete." RCW 36.70B.070(4)(a).

    Despite an application being deemed complete, the city or county may still request additional information. RCW 36.70B.070(2) provides in part:

    The determination of completeness shall not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur.

     



  2. Must landscaping plans be stamped by a licensed landscape architect?
    The state statute regarding landscape architects, Chapter 18.96 RCW, requires that all plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect be stamped with the seal of the registered landscape architect (RCW 18.96.150). However, the statute does not address which plans are required to be stamped by a licensed landscape architect. Each jurisdiction determines which plans must be stamped by a licensed landscape architect and should follow its own regulations. Some jurisdictions have prepared city landscape standards, which outline the types of landscaping plans that must be prepared and stamped by a licensed landscape architect.

  3. Are local governments subject to a 120-day timeline for project permit review? Are cities liable if they fail to act on project permits within a 120-day time period?

    In most cases, local governments should use 120 days as the basic limit for project permit review, although they can exceed this if they make written findings that a specified amount of additional time is needed to process a specific project permit application or type of project.  RCW 36.70B.080(1) provides for the following :

    Development regulations adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 must establish and implement time periods for local government actions for each type of project permit application and provide timely and predictable procedures to determine whether a completed project permit application meets the requirements of those development regulations. The time periods for local government actions for each type of complete project permit application or project type should not exceed one hundred twenty days, unless the local government makes written findings that a specified amount of additional time is needed to process specific complete project permit applications or project types.

    The development regulations must, for each type of permit application, specify the contents of a completed project permit application necessary for the complete compliance with the time periods and procedures.

    Further, RCW 36.70B.080(3) allows a county or city to extend a deadline for issuing a specific project permit application for a “reasonable” amount of time mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the local government. 

    Local governments do face potential liability if they fail to act within a 120-day time period or other time limit established by the local government pursuant to RCW 36.70B.080 discussed above. This potential for liability is based on RCW 64.40.020(1), which reads:

    Owners of a property interest who have filed an application for a permit have an action for damages to obtain relief from acts of an agency which are arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, or exceed lawful authority, or relief from a failure to act within time limits established by law.

    So, if a city or county fails to process a permit application within the timeline it has established in its development regulations, it is subject to potential liability under RCW 64.40.020(1). As a result, cities and counties may want to review established timelines to assure that they can be dependably met.

     



Expand Section Subject Pages (12 Results)

  1. SHB 2386 - Permit Assistance Handouts
    Table of contents from a compilation of permit assistance handouts and material related to Substitute House Bill 2386.
  2. Permit Assistance Handouts: What Should Cities and Counties Include to Address SHB 2386
    Provides information for Washington Cities and Counties on what to include to address SHB 2386 - Permit Assistance Handouts
  3. Helpful Handbook Hints
    Hints on creating hanbooks on permit procedures for cities and counties in Washington.
  4. Local Land Use & Environmental Codes Checklist
    A list of land use and environmental codes which Washington cities and counties may have and which should likely be included in their list of regulations, as required by SHB 2386.
  5. Permit Assistance
    Permit Assistance Information Related to Washington Substitute House Bill 2386 - RCW 36.70B.220
  6. Regulatory Reform Examples
    Provides examples of development codes that include regulatory reform provisions
  7. Permit Assistance Handout Examples
    Examples of permit assistance handouts from Washington jurisdictions
  8. Permit Procedures Studies
    Permit procedures studies, materials relating to streamlining the permit process
  9. Permit Monitoring / Annual Development Permit Reports
    Permit performance measures, activity reports, audits on timeliness of permit application processing
  10. Examples of Measures to Streamline Permit Processing
    Examples of measures to streamline permit processing
  11. Planned Action
    Documents relating to planned actions, city or county plans that facilitate environmental review of subsequent development projects
  12. Customer Service Policies
    Permit applications and plan review customer service policies