| A topical index to MRSC's information resources. |
Planning: PL 6.0000 - Comprehensive land use plans and comprehensive planning
Electronic Documents (0 Results)
- No electronic documents related to this topic were found.
Paper Documents (3 Results)
- "Money matters," by Pat Dugan. Western Planner (Planning and Finance Series), October/November 2007, p.3
Request this document | Document Date: 10/07 - "Requests for proposals for comprehensive plans," by Megan Lewis. PAS Memo, April 1999
Request this document | Document Date: 4/99 - "Mergers and acquisitions," by Robert M. Ward and Norman Tyler. Planning, October 2005, pp.24-27.
Why it is important to integrate historic preservation into comprehensive plans.
Request this document | Document Date: 10/05
MRSC Library Catalog Documents
Featured Inquiries (3 Results)
- What are the notice requirements for amendment of a comprehensive plan?
For code city comprehensive plan amendments, the statutes (RCW 35A.63.073 and RCW 35A.63.070) require that the planning commission hold at least one public hearing. Notice is to be given as provided by ordinance and published at least ten days prior to the hearing. If continued hearings are held, no additional notices need be published. For non-code cities and towns, the statutes (RCW 35.63.105 and RCW 35.63.100) require that the planning commission hold at least one public hearing. For counties, the statutes (RCW 36.70.410, RCW 36.70.380, and RCW 36.70.390) require that the planning commission hold at least one public hearing. Notice is to be published at least ten days prior to the hearing.
The GMA does not add any specific notice and hearing requirements to the existing requirements with respect to adoption of comprehensive plans and plan amendments.
However, RCW 36.70A.140 requires that cities and counties planning under the act
establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures providing for early and continuous public participation in the development and amendment of comprehensive land use plans and development regulations implementing such plans. The procedures shall provide for broad dissemination of proposals and alternatives, opportunity for written comments, public meetings after effective notice, provision for open discussion, communication programs, information services, and consideration of and response to public comments.
- Would amendments to the comprehensive plan for an area being annexed be subject to the once-a-year comprehensive plan amendment restriction?
RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a) limits comprehensive plan amendments to no more than once-a-year, with certain
specific exceptions identified in that subsection. None of those specific exemptions is for amending the comprehensive plan for an area being annexed. However, such an amendment could possibly fit under RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b), which provides that “after appropriate public participation a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan that conform with this chapter whenever an emergency exists.” Not having an area of the city subject to its comp plan as a result of annexation may be considered an emergency so as to fit under that provision. We are not aware of any case law or growth management hearings board decision on point, however. - Request for scope of work for a comprehensive plan update.
Please see the following MRSC Web page section that includes comprehensive plan update scope of work examples: Comprehensive Plan Update Work Programs and Process Examples. In addition, the MRSC Index includes other examples under the topic: Planning: PL 6.1500: Comprehensive plan and plan update work programs, progress reports. The following documents also contain scopes of work for plan development or plan updates:- Request for Consultant Proposals to Update the City of Longview Comprehensive Plan, 2004.
- Bonney Lake Request for Proposals Comprehensive Development Plan for Eastown Neighborhood, 2004.
- Fremont Urban Neighborhood Coalition Phase II Scope of Work - Fremont Neighborhood Plan, 1997, Seattle.
- First Filing Sub-area Plan - Appendix A (Scope of services), Broomfield Heights, CO, 2000.
MRSC Library Material
We also have the following related material available from our library*:
- "Working with Planning Consultants, Part II," Planning Commissioners Journal, No. 32, Fall 1998.
- "Selecting and Retaining a Planning Consultant," by Eric Damian Kelly, PAS Report No. 443, 1993.
- General Plan Update - Appendix A: Detailed Work Program, Humboldt County, CA.
- Plan Update Schedule, Work and Staffing Needs, Sacramento, CA.
* These items are available to Washington State city/town/county employees and elected officials at no charge. Please contact the MRSC Library at (206) 625-1300 or via E-mail mrsc@mrsc.org.
Subject Pages (3 Results)
- GMA Plan/Development Regulations Updates
Provides information for Washington cities and counties on reviewing and revising comprehensive plans and development regulations under the Growth Management Act. - Frequently Asked Questions - Comprehensive Planning/Growth Management
Frequently Asked Questions - Comprehensive Planning/Growth Management - Comprehensive Planning - Growth Management
Provides information on and examples of comprehensive plans planned under the Growth Management Act (GMA) in Washington.

