WAC 463-85-240
Enforcement of the emissions performance
standard on schedule. Any power plant subject to WAC 463-85-120 that does not meet the emissions performance
standard on schedule shall be subject to enforcement under
chapter 80.50 RCW.
(1) Penalties can include:
(a) Financial penalties, which shall be assessed after
any year of failure to meet a sequestration benchmark
established in the sequestration plan or sequestration
program. Each pound of greenhouse gases above the emissions
performance standard will constitute a separate violation, as
averaged on an annual basis;
(b) Revocation of approval to construct the source or to
operate the source.
(2) If a new, modified or upgraded baseload electric
generation facility or unit or baseload electric cogeneration
facility or unit fails to meet a sequestration plan or
sequestration program benchmark on schedule, a revised
sequestration plan or sequestration program will be required
to be submitted no later than one hundred fifty calendar days
after the due date established under subsection (3)(c) of this
section for reporting the failure. The revised sequestration
plan or sequestration program is to be submitted to EFSEC, as
appropriate, for approval.
(3) Provisions for unavoidable circumstances.
(a) The owner or operator of a facility operated under an
approved sequestration plan or sequestration program shall
have the burden of proving to EFSEC in an enforcement action
that failure to meet a sequestration benchmark was
unavoidable. This demonstration shall be a condition to
obtaining relief under (d), (e), and (f) of this subsection.
(b) Failure to meet a sequestration benchmark determined
to be unavoidable under the procedures and criteria in this
section shall be excused and not subject to financial penalty.
(c) Failure to meet a sequestration benchmark shall be
reported by January 31 of the year following the year during
which the event occurred or as part of the routine
sequestration monitoring reports. Upon request by EFSEC the
owner(s) or operator(s) of the sequestration project source(s)
shall submit a full written report including the known causes,
the corrective actions taken, and the preventive measures to
be taken to minimize or eliminate the chance of recurrence.
(d) Failure to meet a sequestration benchmark due to
startup or shutdown conditions shall be considered unavoidable
provided the source reports as required under (c) of this
subsection, and adequately demonstrates that the failure to
meet a sequestration benchmark could not have been prevented
through careful planning and design and if a bypass of
equipment occurs, that such bypass is necessary to prevent
loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage.
(e) Maintenance. Failure to meet a sequestration
benchmark due to scheduled maintenance shall be considered
unavoidable if the source reports as required under (c) of
this subsection, and adequately demonstrates that the excess
emissions could not have been avoided through reasonable
design, better scheduling for maintenance or through better
operation and maintenance practices.
(f) Failure to meet a sequestration benchmark due to
upsets shall be considered unavoidable provided the source
reports as required under (c) of this subsection, and
adequately demonstrates that:
(i) The event was not caused by poor or inadequate
design, operation, maintenance, or any other reasonably
preventable condition;
(ii) The event was not of a recurring pattern indicative
of inadequate design, operation, or maintenance; and
(iii) The operator took immediate and appropriate
corrective action in a manner consistent with good practice
for minimizing nonsequestration during the upset event.
(4) Enforcement for permit violations. Enforcement of
any part of an EFSEC site certification agreement will proceed
in accordance with RCW 80.50.150.
[Statutory Authority: Chapters 80.70 and 80.80 RCW and RCW 80.50.040. 08-14-064, § 463-85-240, filed 6/25/08, effective
7/26/08.]