WAC 352-11-350
Mitigated DNS. (1) An applicant may ask
the agency whether issuance of a determination of significance
(DS) is likely for a proposal. This request for early notice
must:
(a) Be written;
(b) Follow submission of a permit application and
environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the
commission is lead agency; and
(c) Precede the agency's actual threshold determination
for the proposal.
(2) The responsible official can suggest that the
applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the
impacts indicated and revise the environmental checklist as
necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.
(3) The agency shall not continue with the threshold
determination until after receiving a written response from
the applicant changing or clarifying the proposal or asking
that the threshold determination be based on the original
proposal.
(4) If the applicant submits a changed or clarified
proposal, along with a revised environmental checklist, the
agency will make its threshold determination based on the
changed or clarified proposal.
(a) If the agency's response to the request for early
notice indicated specific mitigation measures that would
remove all probable significant adverse environmental impacts,
and the applicant changes or clarifies the proposal to include
all of those specific mitigation measures, the agency shall
issue a determination of nonsignificance and circulate the DNS
for comments as directed in WAC 197-11-340(2).
(b) If the agency indicated general or specific areas of
concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures
that would allow it to issue a DNS, the agency shall determine
if the changed or clarified proposal may have a probable
significant environmental impact, issuing a DNS or DS as
appropriate.
(5) The agency may specify mitigation measures that would
allow it to issue a DNS without a request for early notice
from an applicant. If it does so, and the applicant changes
or clarifies the proposal to include those measures, the
agency shall issue a DNS and circulate it for review under WAC 197-11-350(2).
(6) When an applicant changes or clarifies the proposal,
the clarifications or changes may be included in written
attachments to the documents already submitted. If the
environmental checklist and supporting documents would be
difficult to read and/or understand because of the need to
read them in conjunction with the attachment(s), the agency
may require the applicant to submit a new checklist.
(7) The agency's written response under subsection (2) of
this section shall not be construed as a determination of
significance. In addition, preliminary discussion of
clarification of or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a
written request for early notice, shall not bind the agency to
consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold
determination.
(8) When an applicant submits a changed or clarified
proposal pursuant to this section, it shall be considered part
of the applicant's application for a permit or other approval
for all purposes, including enforcement of the permit or other
approval. Unless the agency's decision expressly states
otherwise, when a mitigated DNS is issued for a proposal, any
decision approving the proposal shall be based on the proposal
as changed or clarified pursuant to this section.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 79A.05 RCW. 07-03-121, §
352-11-350, filed 1/22/07, effective 2/22/07. Statutory
Authority: Chapter 43.21C RCW. 84-20-112 (Order 84), §
352-11-350, filed 10/3/84.]