WAC 332-41-350
Mitigated determination of
nonsignificance (DNS). (1) How may a proponent request an
early notice of a determination of significance (DS)? When
DNR is the lead agency, a proponent may ask DNR whether
issuance of a DS is likely for a proposal. A non-DNR request
for early notice must satisfy three requirements. The
request:
(a) Must be in writing;
(b) Shall follow submission of a permit application, if
applicable, and environmental checklist; and
(c) Must be received by DNR before DNR issues an initial
threshold determination for the proposal.
(2) How should DNR respond to an early notice request?
The responsible official or designee should respond to a
request for early notice within ten business days of receipt. DNR should respond to a forest practices applicant as soon as
possible because RCW 76.09.050 only allows ten days to conduct
a threshold evaluation. If DNR is not the proposal's
proponent, the response shall meet the following requirements:
(a) The response must be in writing;
(b) The response shall state whether DNR is considering
issuance of a DS;
(c) The response shall indicate the general or specific
area(s) of concern that led DNR to consider a DS; and
(d) The response shall state that the applicant may
change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the impacts
indicated in the letter, revising the environmental checklist
as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.
(3) How should early review requests and responses to DNR
proposals be processed? If a project leader from within DNR
requests early notice, it is advisable that both the request
and the response be documented in writing for tracking
purposes.
(4) What is the review process for proposals pending a
request for early notice? DNR shall continue to conduct SEPA
review on the originally submitted proposal until a proposal's
proponent requests, in writing, that the proposal be changed
or clarified.
(5) What should DNR review when changes or clarifications
are added to a proposal? If a proponent submits changes or
clarifications under this section, DNR shall review these
changes or clarifications as part of the proposal.
(a) If DNR's response to the request for early notice
indicated specific mitigation measures that would remove all
probable significant adverse environmental impacts, and the
proponent changes or clarifies the proposal to include all of
those specific mitigation measures, DNR shall issue a
determination of nonsignificance and circulate the DNS for
comments as in WAC 197-11-350.
(b) If DNR indicates general or specific areas of
concern, but does not indicate specific mitigation measures
that would allow it to issue a DNS, DNR shall determine if the
changed or clarified proposal may have a probable significant
environmental impact, and issue a DNS or DS, as appropriate.
(6) May DNR propose mitigation to reduce impacts of the
proposal? Even without a request for early notice, DNR may
specify mitigation measures that would allow DNR to issue a
DNS. If a proponent changes or clarifies the proposal to
include DNR's proposed measures, DNR shall issue a DNS
consistent with WAC 197-11-350 and circulate it for review.
(7) How may a proponent change a proposal? When a
proponent changes or clarifies the proposal, the changes or
clarifications may be added as attachments to previously
submitted documents. If the environmental checklist and
supporting documents would be difficult to read and/or
understand in conjunction with the attachment(s), DNR may
require the applicant to submit a new checklist.
(8) May DNR change its own proposals? DNR may change or
clarify features of its own proposals before making the
threshold determination consistent with WAC 197-11-350.
(9) What is the effect of preliminary discussions? DNR's
indication that a DS appears likely shall not be construed as
a determination of significance. DNR's preliminary discussion
of possible clarification or changes shall not bind DNR in
making a determination of nonsignificance.
(10) When should DNR issue a notice of final
determination for a mitigated determination of
nonsignificance? DNR should issue a notice of final
determination after the SEPA comment period has ended. This
notice should document whether the determination has been:
(a) Retained;
(b) Modified;
(c) Delayed; or
(d) Withdrawn.
(i) If an initial threshold determination is delayed, DNR
should issue another notice of final determination to identify
whether the proposal has been retained, modified or withdrawn.
(ii) DNR should send any notice of final determination to
the original mailing list for the proposal and any additional
parties that commented on the proposal.
[Statutory Authority: Chapters 43.21C, 34.05 RCW, WAC 197-11-902(2), [197-11]-904(1) and delegation order, November
5, 2001, signature authority to adopt rules. 07-08-021, §
332-41-350, filed 3/27/07, effective 4/27/07. Statutory
Authority: Chapter 43.21C RCW and RCW 43.30.150. 84-18-052
(Order 432), § 332-41-350, filed 9/5/84. Formerly chapter 332-40 WAC.]