WAC 332-30-125
Aquatic land use rental rates for
nonwater-dependent uses. All requirements in this section shall
apply to the department and to port districts managing aquatic
lands under a management agreement (WAC 332-30-114).
(1) The value of state-owned aquatic lands withdrawn from
general public use for private nonwater-dependent use shall be
recognized by charging lessees the full fair market rental. No
rent shall be charged for improvements, including fills, on
aquatic lands unless owned by the state. The fair market rental
is based on: (a) Comparable non-DNR market rents, whether based
on land value exclusive of improvements, a percent of gross
revenues, or other appropriate basis, or if not available (b) the
full market value (same as true and fair value) multiplied by the
use rate percentage as determined under subsection (2) of this
section and published in the Washington State Register.
(2) Use rate percentage.
(a) The percentage rate will be based on nondepartmental
market rental rates of return for comparable properties leased on
comparable terms in the locality, or when such do not exist;
(b) The percentage rate of return shall be based on the
average rate charged by lending institutions in the area for long
term (or term equivalent to the length of the lease) mortgages
for comparable uses of real property.
(3) Appraisals: The determination of fair market value
shall be based on the indications of value resulting from the
application of as many of the following techniques as are
appropriate for the use to be authorized:
(a) Shore contribution; utilizing differences in value
between waterfront properties and comparable nonwaterfront
properties. Generally best for related land-water uses which are
independent of each other or not needed for the upland use to
exist.
(b) Comparable upland use (substitution); utilizing
capacity, development, operation, and maintenance ratios between
a use on upland and similar use on aquatic land with such ratios
being applied to upland value to provide indication of aquatic
land value for such use. Generally best for aquatic land uses
which are totally independent of adjacent upland yet may also
occur on upland totally independent of direct contact with water.
(c) Extension; utilizing adjacent upland value necessary for
total use as the value of aquatic lands needed for use on a unit
for unit basis. Generally best for aquatic land uses which are
integrated with and inseparable from adjacent upland use.
(d) Market data; utilizing verified transactions between
knowledgeable buyers and sellers of comparable properties. Generally best for tidelands or shorelands where sufficient data
exists between knowledgeable buyers and sellers.
(e) Income; utilizing residual net income of a commercial
venture as the indication of investment return to the aquatic
land. This can be expressed either as a land rent per acre or as
a percent of gross revenues. Generally best for income producing
uses where it can be shown that an owner or manager of the
operation is motivated to produce a profit while recognizing the
need to obtain returns on all factors of production.
(4) Negotiation of rental amounts may occur when necessary
to address the uniqueness of a particular site or use.
(5) Rental shall always be more than the amount that would
be charged if the aquatic land parcel was used for
water-dependent purposes.
[Statutory Authority: 1984 c 221 and RCW 79.90.540. 84-23-014
(Resolution No. 470), § 332-30-125, filed 11/9/84. Statutory
Authority: RCW 43.30.150. 80-09-005 (Order 343), § 332-30-125,
filed 7/3/80.]