WAC 292-110-050   Advisory opinions.  State officers and employees are encouraged to seek an advisory opinion whenever they have questions concerning ethical standards or potential conflicts of interest. Advisory opinions are intended to provide guidance to a state officer or state employee in advance of an action or decision and thereby prevent ethics violations.

     (1) Whenever requested by a state officer, state employee, or other person, or whenever it deems it in the public interest, the board shall issue advisory opinions. Requests for advisory opinions, if not issued in response to a motion by the board, shall be written and signed, and addressed to either the chair of the board or the executive director. Requests may be made by electronic mail. Each request should provide sufficient information and circumstances to enable the board to evaluate the request and issue the advisory opinion.

     (2) Upon receiving a request for an advisory opinion, the executive director shall, within fifteen calendar days of receipt, acknowledge the request. Persons requesting advisory opinions shall be notified of the status of the request at thirty day intervals until final action is taken.

     (3) The board shall either:

     (a) Deny the request and state the reason(s) for the denial; or,

     (b) Issue a written advisory opinion.

     (4) An advisory opinion is final when it has been approved by the board and is signed by the executive director.

     (5) A person requesting an advisory opinion may, upon receiving the opinion, petition the board for reconsideration within thirty days of the date the opinion is issued if the person believes that the opinion is erroneous in factual detail. A petition for reconsideration shall be written and signed, and shall briefly state the errors of fact. The board may deny the petition if it lacks merit, or if the person who submitted the request provided erroneous information to the board.

     (6) If a state officer or state employee receives an advisory opinion and fails to make a good faith effort to follow its guidance, the board shall give this fact weight when considering a complaint alleging a violation based on the advice received.

     (7) Informal staff analysis. It is the responsibility of the executive director to provide ethics advice to any state officer, state employee, or other person; however, a state officer, state employee, or other person may only rely on written ethics advice. In providing such advice, the executive director may issue a written nonbinding staff analysis. A nonbinding staff analysis is intended to provide ethics guidance and advice in an expeditious manner, but does not substitute for a formal advisory opinion from the board. The executive director shall provide a disclaimer to the person requesting the nonbinding staff analysis that the advice is solely the opinion of the executive director and not the opinion of the board or in any respect binding on the board. Only advisory opinions issued by the board and complaints decided by the board may be relied on for determining how the board will interpret a provision of the Ethics in Public Service Act.

     (a) In considering a complaint alleging a violation, the board will give weight to the fact that the person charged in the complaint relied in good faith on written advice from the executive director.

     (b) The board may review staff analyses provided under this subsection and may approve or disapprove of any advice so provided. However, any such approval or disapproval is limited to whether staff had reasonable grounds for the advice and should not be interpreted as indicating approval or disapproval of the advice provided.



[Statutory Authority: RCW 42.52.360 (2)(b) and 42.52.425. 01-13-080, § 292-110-050, filed 6/19/01, effective 7/20/01. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.52.360 (2)(b) and (c). 98-03-045, § 292-110-050, filed 1/15/98, effective 2/15/98.]