WAC 162-38-105
Removal of dog guides and service animals. (1) General rule. It is an unfair practice to request that a
trained dog guide or service animal be removed, unless the person
can show:
(a) That the presence, behavior or actions of that dog guide
or service animal constitutes an unreasonable risk of injury or
harm to property or other persons; and
(b) A reasonable attempt to eliminate the behavior or
actions of that dog guide or service animal that constitutes an
unreasonable risk fails.
It is an unfair practice to remove a trained dog guide or
service animal from the entire rental property because the animal
presents a risk of injury or harm when in part of the rental
property.
(2) Assessing risk of injury or harm.
(a) Risk to property or other persons must be immediate or
reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances, not remote or
speculative. Risk to persons may be given more weight than risk
to property. Risk of severe injury or harm may be given more
weight than risk of slight injury or harm. For example, an
apartment manager excludes a tenant's dog guide because, "a pet
dog bit one of the kids here a while back, so now I don't allow
any dogs in the complex." This is not "reasonably foreseeable
risk" justifying removal of the dog guide.
(b) Annoyance on the part of staff or other tenants of the
rental property at the presence of the dog guide or service
animal is not an unreasonable "risk to property or other persons"
justifying the removal of the dog guide or service animal.
(c) Risk of injury or harm to the dog guide or service
animal is not a reason to remove or exclude the animal. The
decision whether to bring the animal into the rental property
under such circumstances most properly rests with the person with
a disability using the dog guide or service animal.
(3) Reasonable accommodation. When risk justifies the
removal of a dog guide or service animal from a rental property,
efforts must be made to reasonably accommodate the person with
the disability.
(4) Liability. Law other than the law against discrimination
governs liability for injury or harm. Generally, a person with a
disability using a dog guide or service animal is responsible for
the animal and may be held liable for the actions or behavior of
the animal.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 49.60.120(3). 99-15-025, §
162-38-105, filed 7/12/99, effective 8/12/99.]