WAC 137-56-210
Disciplinary hearing -- Rules of evidence. (1) All relevant and material evidence is admissible which, in
the opinion of the hearing officer, is the best evidence
reasonably obtainable having due regard for its necessity,
availability, and trustworthiness.
(2) All evidence material to the issues raised in the
hearing shall be offered into evidence. All evidence forming
the basis for the hearing officer's decision in a matter shall
be offered into evidence.
(3) The work/training release offender shall be allowed
to call witnesses approved by the hearing officer pursuant to
WAC 137-56-180 (1)(e) and to present documentary evidence in
his/her defense at the hearing when permitting the
work/training release offender to do so will not be unduly
hazardous to the work/training release facility's safety or
correctional goals unless the testimony to be presented by the
witness and/or the information desired to be presented is
deemed by the hearing officer to be irrelevant, immaterial,
unnecessarily duplicative of other information and/or
testimony before the hearing officer, or otherwise found to be
unnecessary to the adequate presentation of the work/training
release offender's case. The testimony of all witnesses from
outside the work/training release facility shall be considered
in writing. In the event the hearing officer determines that
the presence of a witness is appropriate, the hearing officer
should call the witness, or in its discretion, may continue
the hearing if the witness is unavailable, but will become
available within a reasonable period of time: Provided,
however, That if the witness is unavailable, the hearing
officer may, in his or her discretion, consider the written
testimony previously submitted.
(4) The work/training release offender may question
witnesses against him/her at the discretion of the hearing
officer. If the hearing officer determines that a source of
information would be subject to risk or harm if his/her
identity were disclosed, testimony of the confidential source
may be introduced by the testimony of a staff member. The
confidential testimony may be provided by the source or by the
written and signed statement of the source. If the staff
member to whom the source provided information is unavailable,
the written statement of this staff member may be used. The
hearing officer shall, out of the presence of all
work/training release offenders and off the record, identify
the confidential source, and how the testifying staff member
received the confidential information. The staff member
presenting the information from a confidential source shall
identify the source and the circumstances surrounding the
receipt of the confidential information to the hearing
officer, off the record. The hearing officer shall make an
independent determination regarding the reliability of the
confidential source, the credibility of the confidential
information, and the necessity of not revealing the source of
the confidential information. In determining whether the
confidential source is reliable and the confidential
information is credible, the hearing officer should consider
all relevant circumstances including, but not limited to:
(a) Evidence from other staff members that the
confidential source has previously given reliable information;
(b) Evidence that the confidential source had no apparent
motive to fabricate information;
(c) Evidence that the confidential source received no
benefit from providing the information;
(d) Whether the confidential source is giving first-hand
information;
(e) Whether the confidential information is internally
consistent and is consistent with other known facts; and
(f) The existence of corroborating evidence.
The hearing officer shall also determine whether safety
concerns justify nondisclosure of the source of confidential
information. The reliability and credibility determination
and the need for confidentiality must be made on the record.
(5) Documentary evidence, including written statements
submitted by interested parties on behalf of the offender, may
be received. Such evidence may include copies of documents,
excerpts from documents and incorporation of written material
by reference, including depositions.
(6) The hearing officer should determine if the offender
is competent to understand the charges and proceedings or
needs an interpreter to participate therein. If the offender
is not competent or needs an interpreter, the hearing officer
should postpone the hearing to secure a report on the
competency of the offender, provide an interpreter, or take
such other action as will assure the fairness and orderliness
of the hearings.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 72.01.090, 72.09.130, and 9.94.070.
05-24-009 and 06-02-038, § 137-56-210, filed 11/28/05 and
12/28/05, effective 5/1/06. 95-22-060, § 137-56-210, filed
10/30/95, effective 12/1/95. 94-07-065, § 137-56-210, filed
3/14/94, effective 5/1/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 72.65.100. 86-06-012 (Order 86-02), § 137-56-210, filed
2/21/86; 82-08-055 (Order 82-06), § 137-56-210, filed 4/5/82. Formerly WAC 275-92-535.]