WAC 106-120-132
Procedures for proceeding before the
student conduct council. (1) When a case is referred to the
student conduct council the vice-president shall forward to
the council:
(a) A statement describing the alleged misconduct;
(b) The name and address of the complainant;
(c) The name and address of the student charged; and
(d) All relevant facts and statements.
(2) The vice-president shall call a special meeting of
the council and arrange for a proceeding in the following
manner:
(a) The vice-president shall determine the time and place
of the proceeding, which shall be at least five working days
after delivery of written notice to the student. In the
interest of timeliness and efficiency, upon the request of
either the student or the vice-president, this five working
day interval may be waived by the vice-president, with the
student's permission. Time and place shall be set to make the
least inconvenience for all interested parties.
(b) The members of the council shall be selected by the
vice-president from the list of students and faculty appointed
by the council based on their ability to attend the scheduled
hearing. The proceedings board will consist of three students
and two faculty members; and if possible, one student and one
faculty will serve as alternates. Faculty and student members
may be substituted for each other when faculty or student
members are not available. A chair will be selected from the
group assigned for each hearing and will preside over that
meeting acting as the official representative of the
committee.
(c) No case shall be heard unless all the hearing board
is present, unless approved by the appealing student.
(d) All cases will be heard de novo, whether the case be
an appeal from a subsidiary judicial body or is heard as an
original complaint.
(3) The student affairs and enrollment management
secretary shall send written notice by e-mail and mail of the
proceeding to the student's last known address. Certified
mail may be used, if appropriate. The notice shall contain:
(a) A statement of the date, time, place and nature of
the proceeding;
(b) A list of witnesses who will appear, to the extent
known; and
(c) A summary description of any documentary or other
physical evidence that would be presented by the university.
(4) The student shall have all authority possessed by the
university to obtain information he/she specifically describes
in writing and tenders to the vice-president no later than two
working days prior to the proceeding or to request the
presence of witnesses, or the production of other evidence
relevant to the proceeding. However, the university shall not
be liable for information requested by the student or the
presence of any witnesses when circumstances beyond the
control of the university prevent the obtaining of such
information or the attendance of such witnesses at the
proceeding.
(5) Proceedings will ordinarily be held in closed session
unless the proceeding board determines there is a compelling
reason for the proceeding to be open, or the student requests
an open proceeding. A closed proceeding shall include only
members of the proceeding board, the vice-president, persons
directly involved in the proceeding as parties and persons
called as witnesses.
(6) The proceeding shall be audio tape recorded, and the
tape shall be on file at the office of the vice-president for
a period of three years.
(7) The university shall be represented by the
vice-president who shall present the university's case against
the student.
(8) The student must represent himself or herself. The
student may be accompanied by counsel, or another third party,
who may offer advice. If the student utilizes an attorney as
advisor, the student must give to the vice-president two
working days notice of intent to do so. If the student elects
to be advised by an attorney, the vice-president may elect to
have the university advised by an assistant attorney general.
(9) The council chair shall insure that:
(a) The proceeding is held in an orderly manner giving
full care that the rights of all parties to a full, fair and
impartial proceeding are maintained.
(b) The charges and supporting evidence or testimony
shall be presented first, and that there is full opportunity
for the accused student to challenge the testimony and/or
evidence, and to cross examine appropriately.
(c) The student charged shall next present evidence or
testimony to refute the charge, and that there is full
opportunity for the accuser to challenge testimony and/or
evidence, and to cross examine appropriately.
(d) Only those materials and matters presented at the
proceeding will be considered as evidence. The presiding
officer shall exclude incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, and
unduly repetitious evidence.
(10) Any person disruptive of the proceeding or any other
procedure described in this document may be excluded from the
process by the chair of the student conduct council or by the
vice-president, using such means as are necessary to ensure an
orderly process. Any student engaging in such interference
shall be in contempt and may be summarily suspended from the
university by the student conduct council or the
vice-president immediately. The student shall be subject to a
suspension or any lesser sanction as may be determined by the
student conduct council or the vice-president at the time the
interference takes place or within fifteen working days
thereafter.
(11) The student has a right to a fair and impartial
proceeding, but the student's failure to cooperate with or
attend a proceeding shall not preclude the council from making
its finding of facts, conclusions, and recommendations. Failure by the student to cooperate may be taken into
consideration by the student conduct council and the
vice-president in deciding the appropriate disciplinary
action.
(12) Upon conclusion of the proceeding, the proceeding
board in closed session shall consider all the evidence
presented and decide by majority vote to exonerate the student
or to impose one of the sanctions authorized by this document.
(13) The student shall be provided with a copy of the
board's findings of fact and conclusions regarding whether the
student did violate any rule or rules of the student conduct
code and the board's decision as to the appropriate sanction
to be imposed.
(14) If a student charged with misconduct under this code
has been charged with a crime for the same act or closely
related acts by federal, state, or local authorities, or if it
appears that such criminal charge is under consideration, the
student conduct council may postpone action on the complaint
until there has been a disposition of the criminal charge or
of the consideration of filing such charge. However, prior to
action by other agencies, the council may proceed to hear and
decide the case if in the judgment of the council, the nature
of the alleged misconduct and the circumstances surrounding it
pose a serious risk to the health or well-being of the student
or other members of the university. If there is a
determination of guilt by the council and if the subsequent
criminal proceedings result in a judgment of acquittal, the
student may petition the student conduct council for a
rehearing.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.10.528 and 28B.35.120(12). 08-20-053, § 106-120-132, filed 9/24/08, effective 10/25/08;
07-01-065, § 106-120-132, filed 12/18/06, effective 1/18/07;
94-21-048 (Order CWU AO 75), § 106-120-132, filed 10/12/94,
effective 11/12/94. Statutory Authority: Chapter 34.05 RCW
and RCW 28B.35.120(11). 91-04-054, § 106-120-132, filed
2/4/91, effective 3/7/91. Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.19.050 and 28B.35.120(11). 85-07-032 (Order 58), §
106-120-132, filed 3/15/85.]