WAC 463-60-333
Natural environment -- Wetlands. The
application shall include a report for wetlands prepared by a
qualified professional wetland scientist. For purposes of
this section, the term "project site" refers to the site for
which site certification is being requested, and the location
of any associated facilities or their right of way corridors
if applicable. The report shall include, but not be limited
to, the following information:
(1) Assessment of existing wetlands present and their
quality. The assessment of the presence and quality of
existing wetlands shall include:
(a) A wetland delineation performed by a qualified
professional according to the Washington State Wetlands
Delineation and Identification Manual, 1997, and associated
data sheets, site maps with data plots and delineated wetlands
areas, photographs, and topographic and aerial site maps.
(b) A description of wetland categories found on the site
according to the Washington state wetland rating system found
in Western Washington, Ecology Publication #93-74 and Eastern
Washington, Ecology Publication 391-58, or as revised by the
department of ecology.
(c) A discussion of water sources supplying wetlands and
documentation of hydrologic regime encountered.
(d) A function assessment report prepared according to
the Washington State Wetland Function Assessment Method to
assess wetlands functions for those wetland types covered by
the method, and including a description of type and degree of
wetland functions that are provided.
(2) Identification of energy facility impacts. The
application shall include a detailed discussion of temporary,
permanent, direct and indirect impacts on wetlands, their
functions and values, and associated water quality and
hydrologic regime during construction, operation and
decommissioning of the energy facility. The discussion of
impacts shall also include impacts to wetlands due to proposed
mitigation measures.
(3) Wetlands mitigation plan. The application shall
include a detailed discussion of mitigation measures,
including avoidance, minimization of impacts, and mitigation
through compensation or preservation and restoration of
existing wetlands, proposed to compensate for the direct and
indirect impacts that have been identified. The mitigation
plan shall be prepared consistent with the Department of
Ecology Guidelines for Developing Freshwater Wetlands
Mitigation Plans and Proposals, 1994, as revised. The
application shall also include, but not be limited to:
(a) A discussion of how standard buffer widths have been
incorporated into the mitigation proposal. Variances from
standard buffer widths must be supported with professional
analyses demonstrating that smaller or averaged buffer widths
protect the wetland functions and values based on
site-specific characteristics;
(b) A demonstration of how enhancement, restoration or
compensatory mitigation actions will achieve equivalent or
greater hydrologic and biological functions at the impact
site, and whether any existing wetland functions would be
reduced by the mitigation measures;
(c) A discussion of how standard mitigation ratios have
been incorporated into the mitigation proposal. Variances
from standard mitigation ratios must be supported with
professional analyses demonstrating that equivalent or greater
hydrologic and biological functions will be achieved;
(d) A demonstration that the mitigation actions are being
conducted in an appropriate location, and that consideration
was given in order of preference to: On-site opportunities;
opportunities within the same subbasin or watershed assessment
unit; opportunities within the same Water Resources Inventory
Area (WRIA); opportunities in another WRIA;
(e) A discussion of the timing and schedule for
implementation of the mitigation plan;
(f) A discussion of ongoing management practices that
will protect wetlands, including proposed monitoring and
maintenance programs;
(g) Mitigation plans should give priority to proven
mitigation methods. Experimental mitigation techniques and
mitigation banking may be considered by the council on a
case-by-case basis. Proposals for experimental mitigation
techniques and mitigation banking must be supported with
analyses demonstrating that compensation will meet or exceed
requirements giving consideration to the uncertainty of
experimental techniques, and that banking credits meet all
applicable state requirements.
(4) Federal approvals. The application shall list any
federal approvals required for wetlands impacts and
mitigation, status of such approvals, and federal agency
contacts responsible for review.
[04-23-003, recodified as § 463-60-333, filed 11/4/04,
effective 11/11/04. Statutory Authority: RCW 80.50.040 (1)
and (12). 04-21-013, § 463-42-333, filed 10/11/04, effective
11/11/04.]