WAC 222-16-100
Planning options for the northern spotted
owl. (1) Landowner option plans for the northern spotted owl.
Landowner option plans (LOPs) are intended to provide
landowners with a mechanism, entered into voluntarily, to
contribute to the protection of northern spotted owls by
considering the needs of overall population maintenance or
dispersal habitat across a defined geographic area. Forest
practices applications that are in an area covered by an LOP,
and that are consistent with the LOP, will not be classified
as Class IV-Special on the basis of critical habitat (state)
or critical habitat (federal) for the northern spotted owl. This does not preclude classification as Class IV-Special
because of the presence of other factors listed in WAC 222-16-050(1).
(a) Required elements of LOPs. The level of detail to be
included in a LOP will depend on the area of ownership
involved, the time period for which the plan will be in
effect, and the complexity of the management strategy. Nevertheless, each plan shall contain the elements set forth
in this subsection.
(i) Goals and objectives. The specific goals and
objectives for the landowner's contributions proposed under
the LOP shall be developed by the landowner and approved by
the department in consultation with the department of fish and
wildlife based on the following:
(A) Mitigation under the plan must be reasonable and
capable of being accomplished;
(B) To the maximum extent practicable, the plan must
minimize and mitigate significant adverse impacts caused by,
and identified in, the plan on individual northern spotted owl
site centers or the ability of the SOSEA to meet SOSEA goals. Specific short (one to five-year) and long (greater than
five-year) term goals and objectives for the LOP should be
clearly stated, where applicable; and
(C) LOPs should be designed to achieve an appropriate
contribution from nonfederal lands toward meeting SOSEA goals
and are intended to be an efficient and effective alternative
to site-by-site management planning. In Eastern Washington,
LOPs must also consider the need to protect the forests from
catastrophic loss from wildfire, insects, and diseases.
(ii) Other required elements:
(A) A description of the planning area. The LOP planning
area shall include a sufficient amount of the landowner's
forest land within the SOSEA to meet the goals and objectives
of the plan.
(B) A description of the physical features in the
planning area (e.g., geology, topography, etc.).
(C) The current habitat status. Suitable spotted owl
habitat should be categorized and mapped as old forest,
sub-mature, young forest marginal, or dispersal.
(D) The current species status. All status 1, 2, and 3
northern spotted owl site centers and the associated median
home range circles that overlap any of the landowner's
ownership within the LOP boundary must be mapped.
(E) Management proposals and relevant operations plans.
(F) Projected suitable habitat development.
(G) A plan for training.
(H) A monitoring program.
(I) Reporting standards.
(J) The conditions under which the LOP may be modified.
(K) The term of the LOP and conditions for termination. The term of the LOP shall be sufficient to meet its goals and
objectives. The conditions of the LOP run with the land
unless the LOP specifies alternative means to achieve the LOP
goals and objectives upon mid-term sale or transfer. In
addition to any other termination provisions in the LOP, plans
may be terminated by mutual agreement of the landowner and the
department.
(b) Approval of LOPs. Upon receipt of a landowner option
plan, the department shall circulate the plan to the
department of fish and wildlife, affected Indian tribes, local
government entities, other forest landowners in the SOSEA, and
the public for a thirty-day review and comment period. The
department may extend this review period for up to thirty
additional days. Within ninety days of receipt of the plan,
the department shall review the comments and approve or
disapprove the plan or submit the plan to the landowner to
revise as appropriate. The department, after consultation
with the department of fish and wildlife, shall approve the
plan if:
(i) The plan contains all of the elements required under
this section;
(ii) The plan is expected to be effective in meeting its
goals and objectives;
(iii) The plan will not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the ability of the SOSEA to meet its goals;
and
(iv) The plan will not appreciably reduce the likelihood
of the survival and recovery of the northern spotted owl in
the wild.
In making its determination under this subsection, the
department shall consider the direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects of the plan; both the short-term and long-term effects
of the plan; and whether local, state, or federal land
management, regulatory, or nonregulatory requirements will
mitigate identified significant adverse impacts. If the
department does not approve the plan, or approves it over the
objections of the department of fish and wildlife, the
department shall set forth in writing a concise explanation of
the reasons for its action.
(c) Enforcement of LOPs. The department shall review all
applications and notifications from the landowner, proposed
within the plan area, for consistency with the plan. Any
applications or notifications found to be inconsistent with
the plan shall be returned to the landowner for modification. After landowner review, applications and notifications which
are not consistent with the plan shall be classified as Class
IV-Special.
(2) See WAC 222-16-105 for CHEAs.
[Statutory Authority: Chapter 34.05 RCW, RCW 76.09.040,[76.09.]050
, [76.09.]370, 76.13.120(9). 01-12-042, §
222-16-100, filed 5/30/01, effective 7/1/01. Statutory
Authority: RCW 76.09.040 and chapter 34.05 RCW. 97-15-105, §
222-16-100, filed 7/21/97, effective 8/21/97. Statutory
Authority: Chapters 76.09 and 34.05 RCW. 96-12-038, §
222-16-100, filed 5/31/96, effective 7/1/96.]