WAC 222-10-042
Marbled murrelets. The following
policies shall apply to forest practices subject to SEPA where
the forest practices may cause adverse impacts to marbled
murrelets.
(1) Within an occupied marbled murrelet site, forest
practices that will adversely impact this habitat will likely
have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment
except where the department determines, in consultation with
the department of fish and wildlife, that the applicant's
proposal will actually have no significant adverse impact.
(2) Within marbled murrelet detection areas:
(a) Suitable marbled murrelet habitat with at least a 50%
probability of occupancy is assumed to have a high likelihood
of marbled murrelet occupancy. It is currently assumed that 5
platforms per acre meets the 50% probability of occupancy. Without survey information, forest practices that will
adversely impact this habitat may have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment.
(b) Suitable marbled murrelet habitat with at least a
30%, but less than 50% probability of occupancy has a
sufficiently high likelihood of marbled murrelet occupancy to
warrant a survey. This additional information is necessary
for the department to evaluate the environmental impact of the
forest practice. It is currently assumed that 2 platforms per
acre meets the 30% probability of occupancy.
A landowner may request the department of fish and
wildlife to survey. The department of fish and wildlife
should survey to the maximum extent practicable based on an
appropriation to survey marbled murrelet suitable habitat
within detection areas where the landowner provides access for
surveys to the department of fish and wildlife, and sufficient
time is allowed to complete the protocol surveys. The
department shall provide a notice to the landowner within 60
days from the date of application of the department of fish
and wildlife's intent to survey. If the department of fish
and wildlife cannot conduct marbled murrelet surveys the
responsibility for surveys remains with the landowner.
(3) Outside a marbled murrelet detection area:
(a) Suitable marbled murrelet habitat with at least a 60%
probability of occupancy is assumed to have a high likelihood
of marbled murrelet occupancy. It is currently assumed that 7
platforms per acre meets the 60% probability of occupancy. Without survey information, forest practices that will
adversely impact this habitat may have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment.
(b) Within a marbled murrelet special landscape suitable
marbled murrelet habitat with at least a 50% probability of
occupancy is assumed to have a high likelihood of marbled
murrelet occupancy. Without survey information, forest
practices that will adversely impact this habitat may have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment.
(4) When determining whether a forest practice will have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, the
department shall, in consultation with the department of fish
and wildlife, evaluate the impacts on the statewide, regional
(Southwest Washington, Olympic Peninsula, Hood Canal, North
Puget Sound, South Puget Sound and South Cascades) and local
(within the marbled murrelet detection area) marbled murrelet
populations and associated habitats. The department should
consider a variety of information including but not limited to
survey data, habitat quality and patch size, the amount of
edge in relation to the area of habitat, amount of interior
habitat, distance from saltwater, detection rates, the amount
and quality of habitat, the likelihood of predation and the
recovery goals for the marbled murrelet.
(5) The platform assumptions set forth above are based on
regional data. Applicants or others may submit information to
the department which was gathered in conjunction with a
marbled murrelet survey agreement with the department of fish
and wildlife, and other reliable information that is more
current, or specific to the platform numbers in the marbled
murrelet suitable habitat definition. The department shall
use such information in making its determinations under this
section where the department finds, in consultation with the
department of fish and wildlife, that the information is more
likely to be valid for a particular WRIA or physiographic
province. If the department does not use the information, it
shall explain its reasons in writing to the applicant.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 76.09.040 and chapter 34.05 RCW. 97-15-105, § 222-10-042, filed 7/21/97, effective 8/21/97.]