WAC 132B-128-050
Procedures for dismissal. (1) A
dismissal review committee created for the express purpose of
hearing dismissal cases shall be established no later than
October 15 of each academic year (except if this provision is
passed after October 15 of any academic year, the dismissal
review committee will be chosen within thirty days after
passage of this provision), and shall be comprised of the
following members:
(a) One member chosen by the college president
(b) Three faculty members chosen by the faculty and
division heads acting in a body and in the following manner:
(i) Two individuals will be nominated for each of
positions one, two and three by a district-wide random
selection process as described in (v) below.
(ii) Two individuals will be nominated in the same manner
as (i) above to run for each of three alternate positions
identified as alternate one, alternate two and alternate
three.
(iii) The nominees receiving a majority of the votes cast
will be elected for a one-year term.
(iv) In case of a vacancy in position one, two or three
occurring any time after the election, the vacancy will be
filled by the alternates, beginning with alternate one.
(v) A district-wide random selection process will be
developed by the president of Grays Harbor College. This
selection process will be designed to remove any element of
preselection or predisposition from the dismissal review
committee selection process.
(c) A student representative, who shall be a full-time
student, shall be appointed by the Grays Harbor College
student council. The student council shall also appoint a
full-time student as an alternate member to serve on the
dismissal review committee should the regularly appointed
member be unable to serve on the committee.
(d) The college president shall choose one alternate
member to serve on the dismissal review committee should the
regularly appointed member be unable to serve on the
committee.
(e) The dismissal review committee will select one of its
members to serve as chairman.
(2) When the president receives or initiates a formal
written recommendation about a faculty member which may
warrant dismissal, he shall inform that faculty member. Within ten days after having been so informed, the faculty
member will be afforded an opportunity to meet with the
president or his designee and the chairman of the division. At this preliminary meeting, which shall be an
information-gathering session, an adjustment may be mutually
agreed upon. If the matter is not settled or adjusted to the
satisfaction of the college president, he shall recommend that
the faculty member be dismissed.
(3) If the president recommends that the faculty member
be dismissed, he shall:
(a) Deliver a short and plain statement to the faculty
member which shall contain:
(i) The grounds for dismissal in reasonable
particularity;
(ii) A statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction
under which the hearing is to be held;
(iii) Reference to any particular statutes or rules
involved.
(b) Call into action the dismissal review committee and
deliver the above statement to the members of the dismissal
review committee, if the professional requests a hearing.
(4) After receiving the president's recommendation for
dismissal, the affected professional may request a hearing
within the following five days. If the president does not
receive this request within five days, the professional's
right to a hearing will be deemed waived.
(5) If the president receives a request for a hearing,
the dismissal review committee shall, after receiving the
written recommendation from the college president, establish a
date for a committee hearing giving the faculty member so
charged twenty days notice of such hearing, and inform in
writing the faculty member so charged of the time, date and
place of such hearing.
(6) The dismissal review committee shall:
(a) Hear testimony from all interested parties, including
but not limited to other faculty members and students and
receive any evidence offered by same;
(b) Afford the faculty member whose case is being heard
the right of cross-examination and the opportunity to defend
himself and be accompanied by legal counsel;
(c) Allow the college administration to be represented by
an assistant attorney general.
(7) The dismissal review committee shall include a
neutral presiding officer appointed by the appointing
authority. Such presiding or hearing officer shall not be a
voting member of the committee; it shall be his responsibility
to:
(a) Make all rulings regarding the evidentiary and
procedural issues presented during the course of the dismissal
review committee hearings;
(b) Meet and confer with the members of the dismissal
review committee and advise them in regard to procedural and
evidentiary issues considered during the course of the
committee's deliberations;
(c) Appoint a court reporter, who shall operate at the
direction of the presiding officer and shall record all
testimony, receive all documents and other evidence introduced
during the course of hearings, and record any other matters
related to the hearing as directed by the presiding officer;
(d) Prepare a record which shall include:
(i) All pleadings, motions and rulings;
(ii) All evidence received or considered;
(iii) A statement of any matters officially noticed;
(iv) All questions and offers of proof, objections and
rulings thereon;
(v) Proposed findings and exceptions;
(vi) A copy of the recommendations of the dismissal
review committee.
(8) A copy of the above shall be transcribed and
furnished upon request to the faculty member whose case is
being heard.
(9) The hearing shall be closed. However, interested
parties, including but not limited to faculty members and
students, will be given an opportunity to present evidence.
(10) Within ten college calendar days of the conclusion
of the hearing, the dismissal review committee will arrive at
its recommendations in conference on the basis of the hearing.
Before doing so, it should give the faculty member or his
counsel(s) and the representative designated by the president
of the college the opportunity to argue orally before it. If
written briefs would be helpful, the dismissal review
committee may request them. The dismissal review committee
may proceed to a recommendation promptly or await the
availability of a transcript if making a fair recommendation
would be aided thereby. Within fifteen college calendar days
of the conclusion of the hearing the president of the college,
the faculty member and the board of trustees will be presented
with recommendations in writing and given a copy of the record
of the hearing.
(11) The board of trustees shall meet within a reasonable
time subsequent to its receipt of the dismissal review
committee recommendations to consider those recommendations. The board of trustees shall afford the parties the right to
oral and written argument with respect to whether they will
dismiss the faculty member involved. The board of trustees
may hold such other proceedings as they deem advisable before
reaching their decision. A record of the proceedings at the
board level shall be made and the final decision shall be
based only upon the record made before the board and the
dismissal review committee, including the briefs and oral
arguments. The decision to dismiss or not to dismiss shall
rest, with respect to both the facts and the decision, with
the board of trustees after giving reasonable consideration to
the recommendations of the dismissal review committee. The
dismissal review committee's recommendations shall be advisory
only and in no respect binding in fact or law upon the
decision maker, the board of trustees. The board of trustees
shall within fifteen days following the conclusion of their
review, notify the charged faculty member in writing of its
final decision.
(12) Suspension of the faculty member by the president
during the administrative proceedings involving him (prior to
the final decision of the board of trustees) is justified if
immediate harm to himself or others is threatened by his
continuance. Any such suspension shall be with pay.
(13) Except for such simple announcements as may be
required covering the time of the hearing and similar matters,
no public statements about the case shall be made by the
faculty member, the dismissal review committee or
administrative officers of the board of trustees until all
administrative proceedings and appeals have been completed.
(14) Any dismissed faculty member shall have the right to
appeal the final decision of the board of trustees within ten
days of the receipt of the notice of dismissal. The filing of
an appeal shall not stay enforcement of the decision of the
board of trustees.
(15) If the president of Grays Harbor College initiates a
formal written recommendation that a faculty member be
dismissed and the board of trustees decides to retain the
faculty member, or if the trustees' decision to dismiss a
faculty member is reversed by a court, all evidence concerning
the dismissal will be removed from the faculty member's
permanent personnel file if the reason for the denial of the
recommendation was the president's failure to establish the
facts which were the basis for the dismissal recommendation.
If the facts which were the basis for the dismissal
recommendation were shown to the satisfaction of the trustees
and the courts, but the dismissal recommendation was not
followed because the trustees or the courts decided that the
facts were not sufficient to warrant dismissal, the facts
which were shown would be retained in the faculty member's
permanent personnel file along with a record of the outcome of
the dismissal proceeding.
If the facts are to be retained in the faculty member's
permanent personnel file, the faculty member will be given an
opportunity to review the facts and to write an explanation
which will be retained along with the findings of fact.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 28B.50.140(13). 79-08-129 (Order
79-1, Resolution No. 11-79), § 132B-128-050, filed 8/1/79;
Order, § 132B-128-050, filed 3/28/73.]