(1)(a) Except as provided in (b)
through (d) of this subsection, after receipt of the notice of an
appeal that has been filed under RCW 51.52.060(2), the employer
and its representatives shall not have contact to discuss the
issues in question in the appeal with any medical provider who
has examined or treated the worker at the request of the worker
or treating medical provider, unless written authorization for
contact is given by the worker or the worker's representative.
Written authorization is only valid if given after the date that
the appeal is filed and expires ninety days after it is signed.
(b) Contact is permitted as necessary for the ongoing
management of the claim, including but not limited to
communication regarding the worker's treatment needs and the
provider's treatment plan, vocational and return-to-work issues
and assistance, and certification of the worker's inability to
work, unless these issues are in question in the appeal.
(c) If the employer or its representatives wish to
communicate with the examining or treating medical providers
concerning the issues in question in the appeal, and no written
authorization from the worker or the worker's representative has
been obtained, the communication must either be:
(i) In writing, including by e-mail, sent contemporaneously
to all parties with a distinct notice to the provider that any
response must be in writing, including by e-mail;
(ii) In person, by telephone, or by videoconference, at a
date and time mutually agreed to by all parties, with the worker
or the worker's representative given the opportunity to fully
participate; or
(iii) Pursuant to a properly scheduled and noted deposition.
(d) Written authorization is not required if the worker
fails to identify or confirm the examining or treating medical
provider as a witness as required by the board.
(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) and (c) of this subsection,
after receipt of the notice of an appeal under RCW 51.52.060(2),
the worker and the representative for the worker, if any, shall
not have contact to discuss the issues in question in the appeal
with any medical provider who has examined the worker at the
request of the employer pursuant to RCW 51.36.070, unless written
authorization for contact is given by the employer or its
representative. Written authorization is only valid if given
after the date that the appeal is filed and expires ninety days
after it is signed.
(b) If the worker or the worker's representative wishes to
communicate with a medical provider who has examined the worker
pursuant to RCW 51.36.070, and no written authorization from the
employer or its representative has been obtained, the
communication must either be:
(i) In writing, including by e-mail, sent contemporaneously
to all parties with a distinct notice to the provider that any
response must be in writing, including by e-mail;
(ii) In person, by telephone, or by videoconference, at a
date and time mutually agreed to by all parties, with the
department, employer, and their representatives given the
opportunity to fully participate; or
(iii) Pursuant to a properly scheduled and noted deposition.
(c) Written authorization is not required if the employer
fails to identify or confirm the examining medical provider as a
witness as required by the board.
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not apply to
the department.
(a) Except as provided in (b) through (d) of this
subsection, after an appeal has been filed under RCW 51.52.060(2), a conference has been held to schedule hearings,
and the worker has named his or her witnesses, the department and
its representatives shall not have contact to discuss the issues
in question in the appeal with any medical provider who has
examined or treated the worker at the request of the worker or
treating medical provider and has been named as a witness by the
worker or their representative unless written authorization for
contact is given by the worker or the worker's representative.
Written authorization is only valid if given after the date that
the appeal is filed and expires ninety days after it is signed.
(b) Contact is permitted as necessary for the ongoing
management of the claim, including but not limited to
communication regarding the worker's treatment needs and the
provider's treatment plan, vocational and return-to-work issues
and assistance, and certification of the worker's inability to
work, unless these issues are in question in the appeal.
(c) If the department or its representatives wish to
communicate with the examining or treating medical providers
concerning the issues in question in the appeal, and no written
authorization from the worker or the worker's representative has
been obtained, the communication must either be:
(i) In writing, including by e-mail, sent contemporaneously
to all parties with a distinct notice to the provider that any
response must be in writing, including by e-mail;
(ii) In person, by telephone, or by videoconference, at a
date and time mutually agreed to by all parties, with the worker
or the worker's representative given the opportunity to fully
participate; or
(iii) Pursuant to a properly scheduled and noted deposition.
(d) Written authorization is not required if the worker
fails to identify or confirm the examining or treating medical
provider as a witness as required by the board.
(4)(a) Except as provided in (b) and (c) of this subsection,
after an appeal has been filed under RCW 51.52.060(2), a
conference has been held to schedule hearings, and the worker has
named his or her witnesses, the worker and the representative for
the worker, if any, shall not have contact to discuss the issues
in question in the appeal with any medical provider who has
examined the worker at the request of the department pursuant to
RCW 51.36.070, unless written authorization for contact is given
by the department or its representatives. Written authorization
is only valid if given after the date that the appeal is filed
and expires ninety days after it is signed.
(b) If the worker or the worker's representative wishes to
communicate with a medical provider who has examined the worker
pursuant to RCW 51.36.070, and no written authorization from the
department or its representative has been obtained, the
communication must either be:
(i) In writing, including by e-mail, sent contemporaneously
to all parties with a distinct notice to the provider that any
response must be in writing, including by e-mail;
(ii) In person, by telephone, or by videoconference, at a
date and time mutually agreed to by all parties, with the
department or its representatives given the opportunity to fully
participate; or
(iii) Pursuant to a properly scheduled and noted deposition.
(c) Written authorization is not required if the department
fails to identify or confirm the examining medical provider as a
witness as required by the board.
(5) Upon motion by either party, the industrial appeals
judge assigned to the case may determine whether a party has made
itself reasonably available to participate in an in-person,
telephone, or videoconference communication as provided in
subsections (1)(c)(ii), (2)(b)(ii), (3)(c)(ii), and (4)(b)(ii) of
this section. If the industrial appeals judge determines that a
party has not made itself reasonably available, the judge may
determine appropriate remedies including but not limited to
setting a date and time for the contact being requested by a
party, sanctioning the party who has not reasonably made itself
available, or both.
(6) This section only applies to issues set forth in a
notice of appeal under RCW 51.52.060(2).
(7) This section does not limit the reporting requirements
under RCW 51.04.050 and 51.36.060 for issues not set forth in a
notice of appeal.
(8) The department and board may adopt rules as necessary to
implement the provisions of this section.
(9) A medical provider who discusses issues on appeal with
the department or with any employer or worker or representative
of any employer or worker in violation of this section shall not
be held liable for such communication.
[2009 c 391 § 1.]
NOTES:
Application -- 2009 c 391: "This act applies to orders entered on or after July 26, 2009." [2009 c 391 § 2.]