(1) Proceedings under this chapter involving a
domestic insurer shall be commenced in the superior court for the
county in which is located the insurer's home office or, at the
election of the commissioner, in the superior court for Thurston
county. Proceedings under this chapter involving other insurers
shall be commenced in the superior court for Thurston county.
(2) The commissioner shall commence any such proceeding, the
attorney general representing him or her, by an application to
the court or to any judge thereof, for an order directing the
insurer to show cause why the commissioner should not have the
relief prayed for.
(3) Upon a showing of an emergency or threat of imminent
loss to policyholders of the insurer the court may issue an ex
parte order authorizing the commissioner immediately to take over
the premises and assets of the insurer, the commissioner then to
preserve the status quo, pending a hearing on the order to show
cause, which shall be heard as soon as the court calendar permits
in preference to other civil cases.
(4) In response to any order to show cause issued under this
chapter the insurer shall have the burden of going forward with
and producing evidence to show why the relief prayed for by the
commissioner is not required.
(5) On the return of such order to show cause, and after a
full hearing, the court shall either deny the relief sought in
the application or grant the relief sought in the application
together with such other relief as the nature of the case and the
interest of policyholders, creditors, stockholders, members,
subscribers, or the public may require.
(6) No appellate review of a superior court order, entered
after a hearing, granting the commissioner's petition to
rehabilitate an insurer or to carry out an insolvency proceeding
under this chapter, shall stay the action of the commissioner in
the discharge of his responsibilities under this chapter, pending
a decision by the appellate court in the matter.
(7) In any proceeding under this chapter the commissioner
and his or her deputies shall be responsible on their official
bonds for the faithful performance of their duties. If the court
deems it desirable for the protection of the assets, it may at
any time require an additional bond from the commissioner or his
or her deputies.
[2009 c 549 § 7127; 1993 c 462 § 82; 1988 c 202 § 46; 1969 ex.s. c 241 § 13; 1967 c 150 § 31; 1947 c 79 § .31.19; Rem. Supp. 1947 § 45.31.19.]
NOTES:
Severability -- Implementation -- 1993 c 462: See RCW 48.31B.901 and 48.31B.902.
Severability -- 1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.