(1) The
*board shall collaborate with the four-year institutions
including the council of presidents, the community and technical
college system, and when appropriate the workforce training and
education coordinating board, the superintendent of public
instruction, and the independent higher educational institutions
to identify budget priorities and levels of funding for higher
education, including the two and four-year institutions of higher
education and state financial aid programs. It is the intent of
the legislature that recommendations from the *board reflect not
merely the sum of budget requests from multiple institutions, but
prioritized funding needs for the overall system of higher
education.
(2) By December of each odd-numbered year, the *board shall
distribute guidelines which outline the *board's fiscal
priorities to the institutions and the state board for community
and technical colleges.
(a) The institutions and the state board for community and
technical colleges shall submit an outline of their proposed
operating budgets to the *board no later than July 1st of each
even-numbered year. Pursuant to guidelines developed by the
*board, operating budget outlines submitted by the institutions
and the state board for community and technical colleges after
January 1, 2007, shall include all policy changes and
enhancements that will be requested by the institutions and the
state board for community and technical colleges in their
respective biennial budget requests. Operating budget outlines
shall include a description of each policy enhancement, the
dollar amount requested, and the fund source being requested.
(b) Capital budget outlines for the two-year institutions
shall be submitted by August 15th of each even-numbered year, and
shall include the prioritized ranking of the capital projects
being requested, a description of each capital project, and the
amount and fund source being requested.
(c) Capital budget outlines for the four-year institutions
must be submitted by August 15th of each even-numbered year, and
must include: The institutions' priority ranking of the project;
the capital budget category within which the project will be
submitted to the office of financial management in accordance
with RCW 43.88D.010; a description of each capital project; and
the amount and fund source being requested.
(d) The office of financial management shall reference these
reporting requirements in its budget instructions.
(3) The *board shall review and evaluate the operating and
capital budget requests from four-year institutions and the
community and technical college system based on how the requests
align with the *board's budget priorities, the missions of the
institutions, and the statewide strategic master plan for higher
education under **RCW 28B.76.200.
(4) The *board shall submit recommendations on the proposed
operating budget and priorities to the office of financial
management by October 1st of each even-numbered year, and to the
legislature by January 1st of each odd-numbered year.
(5)(a) The *board's capital budget recommendations for the
community and technical college system and the four-year
institutions must be submitted to the office of financial
management and to the legislature by November 15th of each
even-numbered year.
(b) The *board shall develop one prioritized list of
capital projects for the legislature to consider that includes
all of the projects requested by the four-year institutions of
higher education that were scored by the office of financial
management pursuant to chapter 43.88D RCW, including projects
that were previously scored but not funded. The prioritized list
of capital projects shall be based on the following priorities in
the following order:
(i) Office of financial management scores pursuant to
chapter 43.88D RCW;
(ii) Preserving assets;
(iii) Degree production; and
(iv) Maximizing efficient use of instructional space.
(c) The *board shall include all of the capital projects
requested by the four-year institutions of higher education,
except for the minor works projects, in the prioritized list of
capital projects provided to the legislature.
(d) The form of the prioritized list for capital projects
requested by the four-year institutions of higher education shall
be provided as one list, ranked in priority order with the
highest priority project ranked number "1" through the lowest
priority project numbered last. The ranking for the prioritized
list of capital projects may not:
(i) Include subpriorities;
(ii) Be organized by category;
(iii) Assume any state bond or building account biennial
funding level to prioritize the list; or
(iv) Assume any specific share of projects by institution in
the priority list.
(6) Institutions and the state board for community and
technical colleges shall submit any supplemental budget requests
and revisions to the *board at the same time they are submitted
to the office of financial management. The *board shall submit
recommendations on the proposed supplemental budget requests to
the office of financial management by November 1st and to the
legislature by January 1st.
[2011 1st sp.s. c 11 § 104; 2010 c 245 § 10; 2008 c 205 § 4; 2007 c 458 § 202; 2004 c 275 § 7; 2003 c 130 § 3; 1997 c 369 § 10; 1996 c 174 § 1; 1993 c 363 § 6; 1985 c 370 § 4. Formerly RCW 28B.80.330.]
NOTES:
Reviser's note: *(1) The higher education coordinating
board ("board") was abolished by 2011 1st sp.s. c 11 § 301,
effective July 1, 2012.
**(2) RCW 28B.76.200 was repealed by 2011 1st sp.s. c 11 §
244, effective July 1, 2012.
Intent -- 2011 1st sp.s. c 11: See note following RCW 28B.76.020.
Findings -- Expand on demand -- System design plan endorsed -- 2010 c 245: See note following RCW 28B.50.020.
Findings -- Intent -- 2008 c 205: See RCW 43.88D.005.
Part headings not law -- 2007 c 458: See note following RCW 28B.76.090.
Part headings not law -- 2004 c 275: See note following RCW 28B.76.090.
Findings -- Intent -- 2003 c 130: "(1) The legislature finds
that:
(a) At the time the *higher education coordinating board
was created in 1985, the legislature wanted a board with a
comprehensive mission that included planning, budget and program
review authority, and program administration;
(b) Since its creation, the board has achieved numerous
accomplishments, including proposals leading to creation of the
branch campus system, and has made access and affordability of
higher education a consistent priority;
(c) However, higher education in Washington state is
currently at a crossroads. Demographic, economic, and
technological changes present new and daunting challenges for the
state and its institutions of higher education. As the state
looks forward to the future, the legislature, the governor, and
institutions need a common strategic vision to guide planning and
decision making.
(2) Therefore, it is the legislature's intent to reaffirm
and strengthen the strategic planning role of the *higher
education coordinating board. It is also the legislature's
intent to examine options for reassigning or altering other roles
and responsibilities to enable the board to place priority and
focus on planning and coordination." [2003 c 130 § 1.]
*Reviser's note: The higher education coordinating board was abolished by 2011 1st sp.s. c 11 § 301, effective July 1, 2012.
Findings -- 1993 c 363: "The legislature finds a need to
redefine the relationship between the state and its postsecondary
education institutions through a compact based on trust,
evidence, and a new alignment of responsibilities. As the
proportion of the state budget dedicated to postsecondary
education programs has continued to decrease and the opportunity
for this state's citizens to participate in such programs also
has declined, the state institutions of higher education have
increasingly less flexibility to respond to emerging challenges
through innovative management and programming. The legislature
finds that this state has not provided its institutions of higher
education with the ability to effectively achieve statewide goals
and objectives to increase access to, improve the quality of, and
enhance the accountability for its postsecondary education
system.
Therefore, the legislature declares that the policy of the
state of Washington is to create an environment in which the
state institutions of higher education have the authority and
flexibility to enhance attainment of statewide goals and
objectives for the state's postsecondary education system through
decisions and actions at the local level. The policy shall have
the following attributes:
(1) The accomplishment of equitable and adequate enrollment
by significantly raising enrollment lids, adequately funding
those increases, and providing sufficient financial aid for the
neediest students;
(2) The development and use of a new definition of quality
measured by effective operations and clear results; the efficient
use of funds to achieve well-educated students;
(3) The attainment of a new resource management relationship
that removes the state from micromanagement, allows institutions
greater management autonomy to focus resources on essential
functions, and encourages innovation; and
(4) The development of a system of coordinated planning and
sufficient feedback to assure policymakers and citizens that
students are succeeding and resources are being prudently
deployed." [1993 c 363 § 1.]
Effective date -- 1993 c 363: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect July 1, 1993." [1993 c 363 § 7.]
Industrial project of statewide significance -- Defined: RCW 43.157.010.