(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (4),
(5), (6), (8), and (10) of this section, the court shall not
modify a prior custody decree or a parenting plan unless it
finds, upon the basis of facts that have arisen since the prior
decree or plan or that were unknown to the court at the time of
the prior decree or plan, that a substantial change has occurred
in the circumstances of the child or the nonmoving party and that
the modification is in the best interest of the child and is
necessary to serve the best interests of the child. The effect
of a parent's military duties potentially impacting parenting
functions shall not, by itself, be a substantial change of
circumstances justifying a permanent modification of a prior
decree or plan.
(2) In applying these standards, the court shall retain the
residential schedule established by the decree or parenting plan
unless:
(a) The parents agree to the modification;
(b) The child has been integrated into the family of the
petitioner with the consent of the other parent in substantial
deviation from the parenting plan;
(c) The child's present environment is detrimental to the
child's physical, mental, or emotional health and the harm likely
to be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by the
advantage of a change to the child; or
(d) The court has found the nonmoving parent in contempt of
court at least twice within three years because the parent failed
to comply with the residential time provisions in the
court-ordered parenting plan, or the parent has been convicted of
custodial interference in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070.
(3) A conviction of custodial interference in the first or
second degree under RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070 shall constitute a
substantial change of circumstances for the purposes of this
section.
(4) The court may reduce or restrict contact between the
child and the parent with whom the child does not reside a
majority of the time if it finds that the reduction or
restriction would serve and protect the best interests of the
child using the criteria in RCW 26.09.191.
(5) The court may order adjustments to the residential
aspects of a parenting plan upon a showing of a substantial
change in circumstances of either parent or of the child, and
without consideration of the factors set forth in subsection (2)
of this section, if the proposed modification is only a minor
modification in the residential schedule that does not change the
residence the child is scheduled to reside in the majority of the
time and:
(a) Does not exceed twenty-four full days in a calendar
year; or
(b) Is based on a change of residence of the parent with
whom the child does not reside the majority of the time or an
involuntary change in work schedule by a parent which makes the
residential schedule in the parenting plan impractical to follow;
or
(c) Does not result in a schedule that exceeds ninety
overnights per year in total, if the court finds that, at the
time the petition for modification is filed, the decree of
dissolution or parenting plan does not provide reasonable time
with the parent with whom the child does not reside a majority of
the time, and further, the court finds that it is in the best
interests of the child to increase residential time with the
parent in excess of the residential time period in (a) of this
subsection. However, any motion under this subsection (5)(c) is
subject to the factors established in subsection (2) of this
section if the party bringing the petition has previously been
granted a modification under this same subsection within
twenty-four months of the current motion. Relief granted under
this section shall not be the sole basis for adjusting or
modifying child support.
(6) The court may order adjustments to the residential
aspects of a parenting plan pursuant to a proceeding to permit or
restrain a relocation of the child. The person objecting to the
relocation of the child or the relocating person's proposed
revised residential schedule may file a petition to modify the
parenting plan, including a change of the residence in which the
child resides the majority of the time, without a showing of
adequate cause other than the proposed relocation itself. A
hearing to determine adequate cause for modification shall not be
required so long as the request for relocation of the child is
being pursued. In making a determination of a modification
pursuant to relocation of the child, the court shall first
determine whether to permit or restrain the relocation of the
child using the procedures and standards provided in RCW 26.09.405 through 26.09.560. Following that determination, the
court shall determine what modification pursuant to relocation
should be made, if any, to the parenting plan or custody order or
visitation order.
(7) A parent with whom the child does not reside a majority
of the time and whose residential time with the child is subject
to limitations pursuant to RCW 26.09.191 (2) or (3) may not seek
expansion of residential time under subsection (5)(c) of this
section unless that parent demonstrates a substantial change in
circumstances specifically related to the basis for the
limitation.
(8)(a) If a parent with whom the child does not reside a
majority of the time voluntarily fails to exercise residential
time for an extended period, that is, one year or longer, the
court upon proper motion may make adjustments to the parenting
plan in keeping with the best interests of the minor child.
(b) For the purposes of determining whether the parent has
failed to exercise residential time for one year or longer, the
court may not count any time periods during which the parent did
not exercise residential time due to the effect of the parent's
military duties potentially impacting parenting functions.
(9) A parent with whom the child does not reside a majority
of the time who is required by the existing parenting plan to
complete evaluations, treatment, parenting, or other classes may
not seek expansion of residential time under subsection (5)(c) of
this section unless that parent has fully complied with such
requirements.
(10) The court may order adjustments to any of the
nonresidential aspects of a parenting plan upon a showing of a
substantial change of circumstances of either parent or of a
child, and the adjustment is in the best interest of the child.
Adjustments ordered under this section may be made without
consideration of the factors set forth in subsection (2) of this
section.
(11) If the parent with whom the child resides a majority of
the time receives temporary duty, deployment, activation, or
mobilization orders from the military that involve moving a
substantial distance away from the parent's residence or
otherwise would have a material effect on the parent's ability to
exercise parenting functions and primary placement
responsibilities, then:
(a) Any temporary custody order for the child during the
parent's absence shall end no later than ten days after the
returning parent provides notice to the temporary custodian, but
shall not impair the discretion of the court to conduct an
expedited or emergency hearing for resolution of the child's
residential placement upon return of the parent and within ten
days of the filing of a motion alleging an immediate danger of
irreparable harm to the child. If a motion alleging immediate
danger has not been filed, the motion for an order restoring the
previous residential schedule shall be granted; and
(b) The temporary duty, activation, mobilization, or
deployment and the temporary disruption to the child's schedule
shall not be a factor in a determination of change of
circumstances if a motion is filed to transfer residential
placement from the parent who is a military service member.
(12) If a parent receives military temporary duty,
deployment, activation, or mobilization orders that involve
moving a substantial distance away from the military parent's
residence or otherwise have a material effect on the military
parent's ability to exercise residential time or visitation
rights, at the request of the military parent, the court may
delegate the military parent's residential time or visitation
rights, or a portion thereof, to a child's family member,
including a stepparent, or another person other than a parent,
with a close and substantial relationship to the minor child for
the duration of the military parent's absence, if delegating
residential time or visitation rights is in the child's best
interest. The court may not permit the delegation of residential
time or visitation rights to a person who would be subject to
limitations on residential time under RCW 26.09.191. The parties
shall attempt to resolve disputes regarding delegation of
residential time or visitation rights through the dispute
resolution process specified in their parenting plan, unless
excused by the court for good cause shown. Such a court-ordered
temporary delegation of a military parent's residential time or
visitation rights does not create separate rights to residential
time or visitation for a person other than a parent.
(13) If the court finds that a motion to modify a prior
decree or parenting plan has been brought in bad faith, the court
shall assess the attorney's fees and court costs of the nonmoving
parent against the moving party.
[2009 c 502 § 3; 2000 c 21 § 19; 1999 c 174 § 1; 1991 c 367 § 9. Prior: 1989 c 375 § 14; 1989 c 318 § 3; 1987 c 460 § 19; 1973 1st ex.s. c 157 § 26.]
NOTES:
Applicability -- 2000 c 21: See RCW 26.09.405.
Intent -- Captions not law -- 2000 c 21: See notes following RCW 26.09.405.
Severability -- Effective date -- Captions not law -- 1991 c 367: See notes following RCW 26.09.015.
Severability -- 1989 c 318: See note following RCW 26.09.160.