(1) Local governments
may adopt moratoria or other interim official controls as
necessary and appropriate to implement this chapter.
(2)(a) A local government adopting a moratorium or control
under this section must:
(i) Hold a public hearing on the moratorium or control;
(ii) Adopt detailed findings of fact that include, but are
not limited to justifications for the proposed or adopted actions and
explanations of the desired and likely outcomes;
(iii) Notify the department of the moratorium or control
immediately after its adoption. The notification must specify
the time, place, and date of any public hearing required by this
subsection;
(iv) Provide that all lawfully existing uses, structures, or
other development shall continue to be deemed lawful conforming
uses and may continue to be maintained, repaired, and
redeveloped, so long as the use is not expanded, under the terms
of the land use and shoreline rules and regulations in place at
the time of the moratorium.
(b) The public hearing required by this section must be held
within sixty days of the adoption of the moratorium or control.
(3) A moratorium or control adopted under this section may
be effective for up to six months if a detailed work plan for
remedying the issues and circumstances necessitating the
moratorium or control is developed and made available for public
review. A moratorium or control may be renewed for two six-month
periods if the local government complies with subsection (2)(a)
of this section before each renewal. If a moratorium or control
is in effect on the date a proposed master program or amendment
is submitted to the department, the moratorium or control must
remain in effect until the department's final action under RCW 90.58.090; however, the moratorium expires six months after the
date of submittal if the department has not taken final action.
(4) Nothing in this section may be construed to modify
county and city moratoria powers conferred outside this chapter.
[2009 c 444 § 2.]
NOTES:
Intent -- 2009 c 444: "The legislature recognizes that cities
and counties have moratoria authority granted through
constitutional and statutory provisions and that this authority,
when properly exercised, is an important aspect of complying with
environmental stewardship and protection requirements.
Recognizing the fundamental role and value of properly
exercised moratoria, the legislature intends to establish new
moratoria procedures and to affirm moratoria authority that local
governments have and may exercise when implementing the shoreline
management act, while recognizing the legitimate interests of
existing shoreline-related developments during the period of
interim moratoria." [2009 c 444 § 1.]