Future development of
hydropower and protection of river-related resources shall be
guided by policies and programs which:
(1) Create opportunities for balanced development of
cost-effective and environmentally sound hydropower projects by a
range of development interests;
(2) Protect significant values associated with the state's
rivers, including fish and wildlife populations and habitats,
water quality and quantity, unique physical and botanical
features, archeological sites, and scenic and recreational resources;
(3) Protect the interests of the citizens of the state
regarding river-related economic development, municipal water
supply, supply of electric energy, flood control, recreational
opportunity, and environmental integrity;
(4) Fully utilize the state's authority in the federal
hydropower licensing process.
[1989 c 159 § 3.]
NOTES:
Legislative findings -- 1989 c 159: "The legislature finds
that the task force on hydroelectric development and resource
protection has recommended that:
(1) The state adopt goals to direct future development of
hydropower and protection of river-related resources;
(2) The state take steps to enhance the existing hydropower
permit review process; and
(3) The state develop, in concert with appropriate
interests, a comprehensive state hydropower plan." [1989 c 159 §
1.]
Hydro task force -- 1989 c 159: "(1) The Washington state
energy office shall contract with an independent facilitator to
reconvene and coordinate the task force assembled to implement
section 301, chapter 7, Laws of 1987 1st ex. sess. The task
force shall prepare by March 31, 1991, a state comprehensive
hydropower plan to serve the broad public interest regarding
development of cost-effective electricity and conservation of
river-related environmental values. Task force meetings shall be
open to the public. The facilitator shall assist the task force
in appropriate efforts to inform the general public regarding
project concepts and progress. Task force members shall make
appropriate efforts to inform the interest groups they represent.
(2) By December 15, 1989, the task force shall engage in a
midpoint review whereby participants can jointly appraise the
progress of the project. If, in the opinion of the participants,
a consensus to continue as a task force cannot be achieved, the
executive agencies shall use their existing statutory authority
to develop a plan, with the assistance of all affected parties
and participating agencies, building upon the work that has been
done by the task force.
(3) If the task force continues beyond December 15, 1989, it
shall by July 1, 1990, recommend to the legislature a lead agency
for implementation and management of the state comprehensive
hydropower plan." [1989 c 159 § 2.]
Plan content -- 1989 c 159: "(1) At a minimum, the plan shall
designate two categories of resource agreement areas: (a)
Sensitive areas where hydropower development is likely to
conflict with significant environmental values, and (b) less
sensitive areas where development will not conflict with or may
enhance environmental values. Some areas may remain unclassified
due to lack of information or if they fall between the two
categories. The plan shall integrate resource agreement area
findings with existing state laws and programs including instream
flow basin plans prepared by the department of ecology, watershed
planning coordinated by the department of fisheries, watershed
planning coordinated through the Puget Sound water quality
authority, watershed planning for municipal water supply, the
scenic rivers program administered by the parks and recreation
commission, and the planning process developed through the joint
select committee on water resources policy and any actions
resulting from that process.
(2) At a minimum, the final plan report shall:
(a) List applicable laws, rules, and policies;
(b) Describe the waterways or basins covered by the plan;
(c) Designate the categories of resource agreement area for
each waterway or basin;
(d) Describe, for each waterway where hydropower is to be
affected, the significant resources that cause the waterway or
basin to be so designated;
(e) Identify goals, objectives, and recommendations for
improving, developing, or conserving affected waterways;
(f) Describe how the plan is to be integrated with other
planning activities and policy initiatives and how the plan will
be implemented and amended;
(g) Assess the anticipated effect of the plan on hydropower
development and resource protection; and
(h) Describe the plan development process." [1989 c 159 §
4.]