(1) In administering grant programs to improve water quality and
protect habitat, the commission shall:
(a) Require grant recipients to incorporate the
environmental benefits of the project into their grant
applications;
(b) In its grant prioritization and selection process,
consider:
(i) The statement of environmental benefits;
(ii) Whether, except as conditioned by RCW 89.08.580, the
applicant is a Puget Sound partner, as defined in RCW 90.71.010,
and except as otherwise provided in RCW 89.08.590, and effective
one calendar year following the development and statewide
availability of model evergreen community management plans and
ordinances under RCW 35.105.050, whether the applicant is an
entity that has been recognized, and what gradation of
recognition was received, in the evergreen community recognition
program created in RCW 35.105.030; and
(iii) Whether the project is referenced in the action agenda
developed by the Puget Sound partnership under RCW 90.71.310; and
(c) Not provide funding, after January 1, 2010, for projects
designed to address the restoration of Puget Sound that are in
conflict with the action agenda developed by the Puget Sound
partnership under RCW 90.71.310.
(2)(a) The commission shall also develop appropriate
outcome-focused performance measures to be used both for
management and performance assessment of the grant program.
(b) The commission shall work with the districts to develop
uniform performance measures across participating districts and,
to the extent possible, the commission should coordinate its
performance measure system with other natural resource-related
agencies as defined in RCW 43.41.270. The commission shall
consult with affected interest groups in implementing this
section.
[2008 c 299 § 27; 2007 c 341 § 28; 2001 c 227 § 3.]
NOTES:
Short title -- 2008 c 299: See note following RCW 35.105.010.
Severability -- Effective date -- 2007 c 341: See RCW 90.71.906 and 90.71.907.
Findings -- Intent -- 2001 c 227: See note following RCW 43.41.270.