(1) A principal who:
(a) Chose not to be able to revoke his or her directive
during any period of incapacity;
(b) Consented to voluntary admission to inpatient mental
health treatment, or authorized an agent to consent on the
principal's behalf; and
(c) At the time of admission to inpatient treatment, refuses
to be admitted,
may only be admitted into inpatient mental health treatment under
subsection (2) of this section.
(2) A principal may only be admitted to inpatient mental
health treatment under his or her directive if, prior to
admission, a physician member of the treating facility's
professional staff:
(a) Evaluates the principal's mental condition, including a
review of reasonably available psychiatric and psychological
history, diagnosis, and treatment needs, and determines, in
conjunction with another health care provider or mental health
professional, that the principal is incapacitated;
(b) Obtains the informed consent of the agent, if any,
designated in the directive;
(c) Makes a written determination that the principal needs
an inpatient evaluation or is in need of inpatient treatment and
that the evaluation or treatment cannot be accomplished in a less
restrictive setting; and
(d) Documents in the principal's medical record a summary of
the physician's findings and recommendations for treatment or
evaluation.
(3) In the event the admitting physician is not a
psychiatrist, the principal shall receive a complete
psychological assessment by a mental health professional within
twenty-four hours of admission to determine the continued need
for inpatient evaluation or treatment.
(4)(a) If it is determined that the principal has capacity,
then the principal may only be admitted to, or remain in,
inpatient treatment if he or she consents at the time or is
detained under the involuntary treatment provisions of chapter 70.96A, 71.05, or 71.34 RCW.
(b) If a principal who is determined by two health care
providers or one mental health professional and one health care
provider to be incapacitated continues to refuse inpatient
treatment, the principal may immediately seek injunctive relief
for release from the facility.
(5) If, at the end of the period of time that the principal
or the principal's agent, if any, has consented to voluntary
inpatient treatment, but no more than fourteen days after
admission, the principal has not regained capacity or has
regained capacity but refuses to consent to remain for additional
treatment, the principal must be released during reasonable
daylight hours, unless detained under chapter 70.96A, 71.05, or 71.34 RCW.
(6)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, any
principal who is voluntarily admitted to inpatient mental health
treatment under this chapter shall have all the rights provided
to individuals who are voluntarily admitted to inpatient
treatment under chapter 71.05, 71.34, or 72.23 RCW.
(b) Notwithstanding RCW 71.05.050 regarding consent to
inpatient treatment for a specified length of time, the choices
an incapacitated principal expressed in his or her directive
shall control, provided, however, that a principal who takes
action demonstrating a desire to be discharged, in addition to
making statements requesting to be discharged, shall be
discharged, and no principal shall be restrained in any way in
order to prevent his or her discharge. Nothing in this
subsection shall be construed to prevent detention and evaluation
for civil commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW.
(7) Consent to inpatient admission in a directive is
effective only while the professional person, health care
provider, and health care facility are in substantial compliance
with the material provisions of the directive related to
inpatient treatment.
[2004 c 39 § 2; 2003 c 283 § 14.]
NOTES:
Finding -- Intent -- 2004 c 39: "Questions have been raised about the intent of the legislature in cross-referencing RCW 71.05.050 without further clarification in RCW 71.32.140. The legislature finds that because RCW 71.05.050 pertains to a variety of rights as well as the procedures for detaining a voluntary patient for evaluation for civil commitment, and the legislature intended only to address the right of release upon request, there is ambiguity as to whether an incapacitated person admitted pursuant to his or her mental health advance directive and seeking release can be held for evaluation for civil commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW. The legislature therefore intends to clarify the ambiguity without making any change to its intended policy as laid out in chapter 71.32 RCW." [2004 c 39 § 1.]