The family policy
council shall:
(1) Establish network boundaries no later than July 1, 1994.
There is a presumption that no county may be divided between two
or more community networks and no network shall have fewer than
forty thousand population. When approving multicounty networks,
considering dividing a county between networks, or creating a
network with a population of less than forty thousand, the
council must consider: (a) Common economic, geographic, and
social interests; (b) historical and existing shared governance;
and (c) the size and location of population centers. Individuals
and groups within any area shall be given ample opportunity to
propose network boundaries in a manner designed to assure full
consideration of their expressed wishes;
(2) Develop a technical assistance and training program to
assist communities in creating and developing community networks
and comprehensive plans;
(3) Approve the structure, purpose, goals, plan, and
performance measurements of each community network;
(4) Identify all prevention and early intervention programs
and funds, including all programs set forth in RCW 70.190.110,
which could be transferred, in all or part, to the community
networks, and report their findings and recommendations to the
governor and the legislature regarding any appropriate program
transfers by January 1 of each year;
(5) Reward community networks that show exceptional success
as provided in RCW 43.41.195;
(6) Seek every opportunity to maximize federal and other
funding that is consistent with the plans approved by the council
for the purpose and goals of this chapter;
(7) Review the state-funded out-of-home placement rate
before the end of each contract to determine whether the region
has sufficiently reduced the rate. If the council determines
that there has not been a sufficient reduction in the rate, it
may reduce the immediately succeeding grant to the network;
(8)(a) The council shall monitor the implementation of
programs contracted by participating state agencies by reviewing
periodic reports on the extent to which services were delivered
to intended populations, the quality of services, and the extent
to which service outcomes were achieved at the conclusion of
service interventions. This monitoring shall include provision
for periodic feedback to community networks;
(b) The legislature intends that this monitoring be used by
the Washington state institute for public policy, together with
public health data on at-risk behaviors and risk and protective
factors, to produce an external evaluation of the effectiveness
of the networks and their programs. For this reason, and to
conserve public funds, the council shall not conduct or contract
for the conduct of control group studies, quasi-experimental
design studies, or other analysis efforts to attempt to determine
the impact of network programs on at-risk behaviors or risk and
protective factors; and
(9) Review the implementation of chapter 7, Laws of 1994 sp.
sess. The report shall use measurable performance standards to
evaluate the implementation.
[2009 c 479 § 59; 1998 c 245 § 123; 1994 sp.s. c 7 § 307.]
NOTES:
Effective date -- 2009 c 479: See note following RCW 2.56.030.
Finding -- Intent -- Severability--1994 sp.s. c 7: See notes following RCW 43.70.540.