The legislature
finds that solutions to state highway deficiencies have become
increasingly complex and diverse and that anticipated
transportation revenues will fall substantially short of the
amount required to satisfy all transportation needs. Difficult
investment trade-offs will be required.
It is the intent of the legislature that investment of state
transportation funds to address deficiencies on the state highway
system be based on a policy of priority programming having as its
basis the rational selection of projects and services according
to factual need and an evaluation of life cycle costs and
benefits that are systematically scheduled to carry out defined
objectives within available revenue. The state must develop
analytic tools to use a common methodology to measure benefits
and costs for all modes.
The priority programming system must ensure preservation of
the existing state highway system, relieve congestion, provide
mobility for people and goods, support the state's economy, and
promote environmental protection and energy conservation.
The priority programming system must implement the
state-owned highway component of the statewide transportation
plan, consistent with local and regional transportation plans, by
targeting state transportation investment to appropriate
multimodal solutions that address identified state highway system
deficiencies.
The priority programming system for improvements must
incorporate a broad range of solutions that are identified in the
statewide transportation plan as appropriate to address state
highway system deficiencies, including but not limited to highway
expansion, efficiency improvements, nonmotorized transportation
facilities, high occupancy vehicle facilities, transit facilities
and services, rail facilities and services, and transportation
demand management programs.
[2002 c 5 § 401; 1993 c 490 § 1; 1969 ex.s. c 39 § 1; 1963 c 173 § 1.]
NOTES:
Effective date -- 2002 c 5 §§ 401-404: "Sections 401 through 404 of this act take effect July 1, 2002." [2002 c 5 § 417.]
Captions not law -- Severability -- 2002 c 5: See notes following RCW 47.04.280.