(1) When the department of licensing receives a
report from a medical review officer, breath alcohol technician,
employer, contractor, or consortium that a driver has a verified
positive drug test or positive alcohol confirmation test, as part
of the testing program conducted under 49 C.F.R. 40, the
department shall disqualify the driver from driving a commercial
motor vehicle under RCW 46.25.090(7) subject to a hearing as
provided in this section. The department shall notify the person
in writing of the disqualification by first-class mail. The
notice must explain the procedure for the person to request a
hearing.
(2) A person disqualified from driving a commercial motor
vehicle for having a verified positive drug test or positive
alcohol confirmation test may request a hearing to challenge the
disqualification within twenty days from the date notice is
given. If the request for a hearing is mailed, it must be
postmarked within twenty days after the department has given
notice of the disqualification.
(3) The hearing must be conducted in the county of the
person's residence, except that the department may conduct all or
part of the hearing by telephone or other electronic means.
(4) For the purposes of this section, or for the purpose of
a hearing de novo in an appeal to superior court, the hearing
must be limited to the following issues: (a) Whether the driver
is the person who is the subject of the report; (b) whether the
motor carrier, employer, or consortium has a program that is
subject to the federal requirements under 49 C.F.R. 40; and (c)
whether the medical review officer or breath alcohol technician
making the report accurately followed the protocols established
to verify or confirm the results, or if the driver refused a
test, whether the circumstances constitute the refusal of a test
under 49 C.F.R. 40. Evidence may be presented to demonstrate
that the test results are a false positive. For the purpose of a
hearing under this section, a copy of a positive test result with
a declaration by the tester or medical review officer or breath
alcohol technician stating the accuracy of the laboratory
protocols followed to arrive at the test result is prima facie
evidence:
(i) Of a verified positive drug test or positive alcohol
confirmation test result;
(ii) That the motor carrier, employer, or consortium has a
program that is subject to the federal requirements under 49
C.F.R. 40; and
(iii) That the medical review officer or breath alcohol
technician making the report accurately followed the protocols
for testing established to verify or confirm the results.
After the hearing, the department shall order the
disqualification of the person either be rescinded or sustained.
(5) If the person does not request a hearing within the
twenty-day time limit, or if the person fails to appear at a
hearing, the person has waived the right to a hearing and the
department shall sustain the disqualification.
(6) A decision by the department disqualifying a person from
driving a commercial motor vehicle is stayed and does not take
effect while a formal hearing is pending under this section or
during the pendency of a subsequent appeal to superior court so
long as there is no conviction for a moving violation or no
finding that the person has committed a traffic infraction that
is a moving violation and the department receives no further
report of a verified positive drug test or positive alcohol
confirmation test during the pendency of the hearing and appeal.
If the disqualification is sustained after the hearing, the
person who is disqualified may file a petition in the superior
court of the county of his or her residence to review the final
order of disqualification by the department in the manner
provided in RCW 46.20.334.
(7) The department of licensing may adopt rules specifying
further requirements for requesting and conducting a hearing
under this section.
(8) The department of licensing is not civilly liable for
damage resulting from disqualifying a driver based on a verified
positive drug test or positive alcohol confirmation test result
as required by this section or for damage resulting from release
of this information that occurs in the normal course of business.
[2005 c 325 § 4; 2002 c 272 § 2.]
NOTES:
Intent -- 2005 c 325: See note following RCW 46.25.010.