(1) The Washington
state economic development commission shall, with the advice of
an innovation partnership advisory group selected by the
commission, have oversight responsibility for the implementation
of the state's efforts to further innovation partnerships
throughout the state. The commission shall:
(a) Provide information and advice to the department of
community, trade, and economic development to assist in the
implementation of the innovation partnership zone program,
including criteria to be used in the selection of grant
applicants for funding;
(b) Document clusters of companies throughout the state that
have comparative competitive advantage or the potential for
comparative competitive advantage, using the process and criteria
for identifying strategic clusters developed by the working group
specified in subsection (2) of this section;
(c) Conduct an innovation opportunity analysis to identify
(i) the strongest current intellectual assets and research teams
in the state focused on emerging technologies and their
commercialization, and (ii) faculty and researchers that could
increase their focus on commercialization of technology if
provided the appropriate technical assistance and resources;
(d) Based on its findings and analysis, and in conjunction
with the higher education coordinating board and research
institutions:
(i) Develop a plan to build on existing, and develop new,
intellectual assets and innovation research teams in the state in
research areas where there is a high potential to commercialize
technologies. The commission shall present the plan to the
governor and legislature by December 31, 2007. The higher
education coordinating board shall be responsible for
implementing the plan in conjunction with the publicly funded
research institutions in the state. The plan shall address the
following elements and such other elements as the commission
deems important:
(A) Specific mechanisms to support, enhance, or develop
innovation research teams and strengthen their research and
commercialization capacity in areas identified as useful to
strategic clusters and innovative firms in the state;
(B) Identification of the funding necessary for laboratory
infrastructure needed to house innovation research teams;
(C) Specification of the most promising research areas
meriting enhanced resources and recruitment of significant
entrepreneurial researchers to join or lead innovation research
teams;
(D) The most productive approaches to take in the
recruitment, in the identified promising research areas, of a
minimum of ten significant entrepreneurial researchers over the
next ten years to join or lead innovation research teams;
(E) Steps to take in solicitation of private sector support
for the recruitment of entrepreneurial researchers and the
commercialization activity of innovation research teams; and
(F) Mechanisms for ensuring the location of innovation
research teams in innovation partnership zones;
(ii) Provide direction for the development of comprehensive
entrepreneurial assistance programs at research institutions.
The programs may involve multidisciplinary students, faculty,
entrepreneurial researchers, entrepreneurs, and investors in
building business models and evolving business plans around
innovative ideas. The programs may provide technical assistance
and the support of an entrepreneur-in-residence to innovation
research teams and offer entrepreneurial training to faculty,
researchers, undergraduates, and graduate students. Curriculum
leading to a certificate in entrepreneurship may also be offered;
(e) Develop performance measures to be used in evaluating
the performance of innovation research teams, the implementation
of the plan and programs under (d)(i) and (ii) of this
subsection, and the performance of innovation partnership zone
grant recipients, including but not limited to private investment
measures, business initiation measures, job creation measures,
and measures of innovation such as licensing of ideas in research
institutions, patents, or other recognized measures of
innovation. The performance measures developed shall be
consistent with the economic development commission's
comprehensive plan for economic development and its standards and
metrics for program evaluation. The commission shall report to
the legislature and the governor by December 31, 2008, on the
measures developed; and
(f) Using the performance measures developed, perform a
biennial assessment and report, the first of which shall be due
December 31, 2012, on:
(i) Commercialization of technologies developed at state
universities, found at other research institutions in the state,
and facilitated with public assistance at existing companies;
(ii) Outcomes of the funding of innovation research teams
and recruitment of significant entrepreneurial researchers;
(iii) Comparison with other states of Washington's outcomes
from the innovation research teams and efforts to recruit
significant entrepreneurial researchers; and
(iv) Outcomes of the grants for innovation partnership
zones.
The report shall include recommendations for modifications of
chapter 227, Laws of 2007 and of state commercialization efforts
that would enhance the state's economic competitiveness.
(2) The economic development commission and the workforce
training and education coordinating board shall jointly convene a
working group to:
(a) Specify the process and criteria for identification of
substate geographic concentrations of firms or employment in an
industry and the industry's customers, suppliers, supporting
businesses, and institutions, which process will include the use
of labor market information from the employment security
department and local labor markets; and
(b) Establish criteria for identifying strategic clusters
which are important to economic prosperity in the state,
considering cluster size, growth rate, and wage levels among
other factors.
[2007 c 227 § 2.]