(1) The director may only approve an application
providing a loan for a project which the director finds:
(a) Will result in the creation of employment opportunities,
the maintenance of threatened employment, or development or
expansion of business ownership by minorities and women;
(b) Will conform to federal rules and regulations governing
the spending of federal community development block grant funds;
(c) Will be of public benefit and for a public purpose, and
that the benefits, including increased or maintained employment,
improved standard of living, the employment of disadvantaged
workers, and development or expansion of business ownership by
minorities and women, will primarily accrue to residents of the
area;
(d) Will probably be successful;
(e) Would probably not be completed without the loan because
other capital or financing at feasible terms is unavailable or
the return on investment is inadequate.
(2) The director shall, subject to federal block grant
criteria, give higher priority to economic development projects
that contain provisions for child care.
(3) The director may not approve an application if it fails
to provide for adequate reporting or disclosure of financial data
to the director. The director may require an annual or other
periodic audit of the project books.
(4) The director may require that the project be managed in
whole or in part by a local development organization and may
prescribe a management fee to be paid to such organization by the
recipient of the loan or grant.
(5) The director may approve an application which results in
a loan or grant of up to one million dollars.
(6) The director shall fix the terms and rates pertaining to
fund loans.
(7) Should there be more demand for loans than funds
available for lending, the director shall provide loans for those
projects which will lead to the greatest amount of employment or
benefit to a community. In determining the "greatest amount of
employment or benefit" the director shall also consider the
employment which would be saved by its loan and the benefit
relative to the community, not just the total number of new jobs
or jobs saved.
(8) To the extent permitted under federal law the director
shall require applicants to provide for the transfer of all
payments of principal and interest on loans to the fund created
under this chapter. Under circumstances where the federal law
does not permit the director to require such transfer, the
director shall give priority to applications where the applicants
on their own volition make commitments to provide for the
transfer.
(9) The director shall not approve any application to
finance or help finance a shopping mall.
(10) For loans not made to minority and women-owned
businesses, the director shall make at least eighty percent of
the appropriated funds available to projects located in
distressed areas, and may make up to twenty percent available to
projects located in areas not designated as distressed. For
loans not made to minority and women-owned businesses, the
director shall not make funds available to projects located in
areas not designated as distressed if the fund's net worth is
less than seven million one hundred thousand dollars.
(11) If an objection is raised to a project on the basis of
unfair business competition, the director shall evaluate the
potential impact of a project on similar businesses located in
the local market area. A grant may be denied by the director if
a project is not likely to result in a net increase in employment
within a local market area.
(12) For loans to minority and women-owned businesses who do
not meet the credit criteria, the director may consider
nontraditional credit standards to offset past discrimination
that has precluded full participation of minority or women-owned
businesses in the economy. For applicants with high potential
who do not meet the credit criteria, the director shall consider
developing alternative borrowing methods. For applicants denied
loans due to credit problems, the department shall provide
financial counseling within available resources and provide
referrals to credit rehabilitation services. In circumstances of
competing applications, priority shall be given to members of
eligible groups which previously have been least served by this
fund.
[2005 c 136 § 5; 1993 c 512 § 12; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 74; 1989 c 430 § 9; 1987 c 461 § 4; 1986 c 204 § 2; 1985 c 164 § 5.]
NOTES:
Savings--Effective date -- 2005 c 136: See notes following RCW 43.168.020.
Intent -- 1990 1st ex.s. c 17: See note following RCW 43.210.010.
Severability -- Part, section headings not law -- 1990 1st ex.s. c 17: See RCW 36.70A.900 and 36.70A.901.
Legislative findings -- Severability -- 1989 c 430: See notes following RCW 43.31.502.