(1) As limited in subsection (3) of this
section, a watershed management partnership formed or qualified
under the authority of RCW 39.34.200 and 39.34.210, including the
separate legal entity established by such a partnership under RCW 39.34.030(3)(b) to conduct the cooperative undertaking of the
partnership under the same statutory authority, may exercise the
power of eminent domain as provided in chapter 8.12 RCW.
(2) The eminent domain authority granted under subsection
(1) of this section may be exercised only for those utility
purposes for which the watershed partnership was formed and is
limited solely to providing water services to its customers.
(3) Subsection (1) of this section applies only to a
watershed management partnership that:
(a) Was formed or qualified before July 1, 2006, under the
authority of RCW 39.34.200 and 39.34.210;
(b) Is not engaged in planning or in implementing a plan for
a water resource inventory area under the terms of chapter 90.82 RCW;
(c) Is composed entirely of cities and water-sewer districts
authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain in the manner
provided by chapter 8.12 RCW; and
(d) Is governed by a board of directors consisting entirely
of elected officials from the cities and water-sewer districts
that constitute the watershed management partnership.
(4) A watershed management partnership exercising authority
under this section shall:
(a) Comply with the notice requirements of RCW 8.25.290;
(b) Provide notice to the city, town, or county with
jurisdiction over the subject property by certified mail thirty
days prior to the partnership board authorizing condemnation; and
(c) With any city that is not a member of the watershed
management partnership and that has water or sewer service areas
within one-half mile of Lake Tapps or water or sewer service
areas within five miles upstream from Lake Tapps along the White
river, enter into an interlocal agreement to allow eminent domain
within that city prior to exercising eminent domain authority
under this section.
(5) The legislature is currently unaware of any information
suggesting that the expected use by the watershed management
partnership of the Lake Tapps water supply will have a
significantly adverse effect on surrounding communities.
However, if the watershed management partnership's Lake Tapps
water supply operations result in a negative impact to the water
supplies of a city that is not a member of the watershed
management partnership and the city has water or sewer service
areas within one-half mile of Lake Tapps or water or sewer
service areas within five miles upstream from Lake Tapps along
the White river, the city claiming a negative impact under this
subsection must notify the watershed management partnership of
their claim and give the partnership at least sixty days to
resolve the claimed impact. If the watershed management
partnership fails to resolve the claimed negative impact or
disputes that the negative impact exists, the city claiming the
negative impact under this subsection may pursue existing legal
remedies in accordance with state and federal law. If a court
determines that a negative impact has occurred as provided under
this subsection, the watershed management partnership shall
implement a remedy acceptable to the claiming city. If the
affected city or cities and the watershed management partnership
cannot agree on the terms required under this subsection, the
court shall establish the terms for the remedy required under
this subsection.
[2009 c 504 § 1.]