(1) A
growth management hearings board shall hear and determine only
those petitions alleging either:
(a) That a state agency, county, or city planning under this
chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of this
chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption of
shoreline master programs or amendments thereto, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development regulations, or
amendments, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW; or
(b) That the twenty-year growth management planning
population projections adopted by the office of financial
management pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 should be adjusted.
(2) A petition may be filed only by: (a) The state, or a
county or city that plans under this chapter; (b) a person who
has participated orally or in writing before the county or city
regarding the matter on which a review is being requested; (c) a
person who is certified by the governor within sixty days of
filing the request with the board; or (d) a person qualified
pursuant to RCW 34.05.530.
(3) For purposes of this section "person" means any
individual, partnership, corporation, association, state agency,
governmental subdivision or unit thereof, or public or private
organization or entity of any character.
(4) To establish participation standing under subsection
(2)(b) of this section, a person must show that his or her
participation before the county or city was reasonably related to
the person's issue as presented to the board.
(5) When considering a possible adjustment to a growth
management planning population projection prepared by the office
of financial management, a board shall consider the implications
of any such adjustment to the population forecast for the entire
state.
The rationale for any adjustment that is adopted by a board
must be documented and filed with the office of financial
management within ten working days after adoption.
If adjusted by a board, a county growth management planning
population projection shall only be used for the planning
purposes set forth in this chapter and shall be known as a "board
adjusted population projection". None of these changes shall
affect the official state and county population forecasts
prepared by the office of financial management, which shall
continue to be used for state budget and planning purposes.
[2003 c 332 § 2; 1996 c 325 § 2; 1995 c 347 § 108; 1994 c 249 § 31; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 9.]
NOTES:
Intent -- 2003 c 332: "This act is intended to codify the Washington State Court of Appeals holding in Wells v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, 100 Wn. App. 657 (2000), by mandating that to establish participation standing under the growth management act, a person must show that his or her participation before the county or city was reasonably related to the person's issue as presented to the growth management hearings board." [2003 c 332 § 1.]
Severability -- Effective date -- 1996 c 325: See notes following RCW 36.70A.270.
Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.
Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.