(1) Whenever a
child is ordered removed from the home, a permanency plan shall
be developed no later than sixty days from the time the
supervising agency assumes responsibility for providing services,
including placing the child, or at the time of a hearing under
RCW 13.34.130, whichever occurs first. The permanency planning
process continues until a permanency planning goal is achieved or
dependency is dismissed. The planning process shall include
reasonable efforts to return the child to the parent's home.
(2) The agency supervising the dependency shall submit a
written permanency plan to all parties and the court not less
than fourteen days prior to the scheduled hearing. Responsive
reports of parties not in agreement with the supervising agency's
proposed permanency plan must be provided to the supervising
agency, all other parties, and the court at least seven days
prior to the hearing.
The permanency plan shall include:
(a) A permanency plan of care that shall identify one of the
following outcomes as a primary goal and may identify additional
outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home
of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption;
guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or
foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written
agreement between the parties and the care provider; successful
completion of a responsible living skills program; or independent
living, if appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older.
The department shall not discharge a child to an independent
living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless
the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW;
(b) Unless the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(5), that a termination petition be filed, a specific
plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be
taken to return the child home, what steps the agency will take
to promote existing appropriate sibling relationships and/or
facilitate placement together or contact in accordance with the
best interests of each child, and what actions the agency will
take to maintain parent-child ties. All aspects of the plan
shall include the goal of achieving permanence for the child.
(i) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents
will be offered to enable them to resume custody, what
requirements the parents must meet to resume custody, and a time
limit for each service plan and parental requirement.
(ii) Visitation is the right of the family, including the
child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best
interest of the child. Early, consistent, and frequent
visitation is crucial for maintaining parent-child relationships
and making it possible for parents and children to safely
reunify. The agency shall encourage the maximum parent and child
and sibling contact possible, when it is in the best interest of
the child, including regular visitation and participation by the
parents in the care of the child while the child is in placement.
Visitation shall not be limited as a sanction for a parent's
failure to comply with court orders or services where the health,
safety, or welfare of the child is not at risk as a result of the
visitation. Visitation may be limited or denied only if the
court determines that such limitation or denial is necessary to
protect the child's health, safety, or welfare. The court and
the agency should rely upon community resources, relatives,
foster parents, and other appropriate persons to provide
transportation and supervision for visitation to the extent that
such resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's
safety would not be compromised.
(iii) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home
as possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless
the court finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary
to promote the child's or parents' well-being.
(iv) The plan shall state whether both in-state and, where
appropriate, out-of-state placement options have been considered
by the department.
(v) Unless it is not in the best interests of the child,
whenever practical, the plan should ensure the child remains
enrolled in the school the child was attending at the time the
child entered foster care.
(vi) The agency charged with supervising a child in
placement shall provide all reasonable services that are
available within the agency, or within the community, or those
services which the department has existing contracts to purchase.
It shall report to the court if it is unable to provide such
services; and
(c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(5),
that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where
the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve
permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to
the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of
the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation
between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the
termination petition. The agency shall not be required to
develop a plan of services for the parents or provide services to
the parents if the court orders a termination petition be filed.
However, reasonable efforts to ensure visitation and contact
between siblings shall be made unless there is reasonable cause
to believe the best interests of the child or siblings would be
jeopardized.
(3) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the
earliest possible date. If the child has been in out-of-home
care for fifteen of the most recent twenty-two months, the court
shall require the department to file a petition seeking
termination of parental rights in accordance with RCW 13.34.145(3)(b)(vi). In cases where parental rights have been
terminated, the child is legally free for adoption, and adoption
has been identified as the primary permanency planning goal, it
shall be a goal to complete the adoption within six months
following entry of the termination order.
(4) If the court determines that the continuation of
reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need to remove the
child from his or her home or to safely return the child home
should not be part of the permanency plan of care for the child,
reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely
manner and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize
the permanent placement of the child.
(5) The identified outcomes and goals of the permanency plan
may change over time based upon the circumstances of the
particular case.
(6) The court shall consider the child's relationships with
the child's siblings in accordance with RCW 13.34.130(3).
(7) For purposes related to permanency planning:
(a) "Guardianship" means a dependency guardianship or a
legal guardianship pursuant to chapter 11.88 RCW or equivalent
laws of another state or a federally recognized Indian tribe.
(b) "Permanent custody order" means a custody order entered
pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW.
(c) "Permanent legal custody" means legal custody pursuant
to chapter 26.10 RCW or equivalent laws of another state or a
federally recognized Indian tribe.
[2008 c 267 § 3; 2008 c 152 § 2; 2007 c 413 § 7; 2004 c 146 § 1; 2003 c 227 § 4; 2002 c 52 § 6; 2000 c 122 § 18.]
NOTES:
Reviser's note: This section was amended by 2008 c 152 § 2 and by 2008 c 267 § 3, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section under RCW 1.12.025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1.12.025(1).
Findings -- Intent -- 2008 c 152: "The legislature finds that meeting the needs of vulnerable children who enter the child welfare system includes protecting the child's right to a safe, stable, and permanent home where the child receives basic nurturing. The legislature also finds that according to measures of timely dependency case processing, many children's cases are not meeting the federal and state standards intended to promote child-centered decision making in dependency cases. The legislature intends to encourage a greater focus on children's developmental needs and to promote closer adherence to timeliness standards in the resolution of dependency cases." [2008 c 152 § 1.]
Severability -- 2007 c 413: See note following RCW 13.34.215.
Intent -- 2003 c 227: See note following RCW 13.34.130.
Intent -- 2002 c 52: See note following RCW 13.34.025.