(1) If a defendant is
acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity, and it is found that
he or she is not a substantial danger to other persons, and does
not present a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts
jeopardizing public safety or security, unless kept under further
control by the court or other persons or institutions, the court
shall direct the defendant's release. If it is found that such
defendant is a substantial danger to other persons, or presents a
substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing
public safety or security, unless kept under further control by
the court or other persons or institutions, the court shall order
his or her hospitalization, or any appropriate alternative
treatment less restrictive than detention in a state mental
hospital, pursuant to the terms of this chapter.
(2) If the defendant has been found not guilty by reason of
insanity and a substantial danger, or presents a substantial
likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety
or security, so as to require treatment then the secretary shall
immediately cause the defendant to be evaluated to ascertain if
the defendant is developmentally disabled. When appropriate, and subject to
available funds, the defendant may be committed to a program
specifically reserved for the treatment and training of developmentally disabled persons. A person so committed shall
receive habilitation services according to an individualized
service plan specifically developed to treat the behavior which
was the subject of the criminal proceedings. The treatment
program shall be administered by developmental disabilities
professionals and others trained specifically in the needs of developmentally disabled persons. The treatment program shall
provide physical security to a degree consistent with the finding
that the defendant is dangerous and may incorporate varying
conditions of security and alternative sites when the
dangerousness of any particular defendant makes this necessary. The department may limit admissions to this specialized program
in order to ensure that expenditures for services do not exceed
amounts appropriated by the legislature and allocated by the
department for such services. The department may establish
admission priorities in the event that the number of eligible
persons exceeds the limits set by the department.
(3) If it is found that such defendant is not a substantial
danger to other persons, and does not present a substantial
likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety
or security, but that he or she is in need of control by the
court or other persons or institutions, the court shall direct
the defendant's conditional release.
[2000 c 94 § 14; 1998 c 297 § 39; 1989 c 420 § 6; 1983 c 25 § 1; 1979 ex.s. c 215 § 4; 1974 ex.s. c 198 § 10; 1973 1st ex.s. c 117 § 11.]
NOTES:
Effective dates--Severability -- Intent -- 1998 c 297: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.