RCW 9.94A.740
Community placement, custody
violators -- Arrest, detention, financial responsibility.
(Effective until August 1, 2009.)
(1) The secretary may issue
warrants for the arrest of any offender who violates a condition
of community placement or community custody. The arrest warrants
shall authorize any law enforcement or peace officer or community
corrections officer of this state or any other state where such
offender may be located, to arrest the offender and place him or
her in total confinement pending disposition of the alleged
violation. The department shall compensate the local
jurisdiction at the office of financial management's adjudicated
rate, in accordance with RCW 70.48.440. A community corrections
officer, if he or she has reasonable cause to believe an offender
in community placement or community custody has violated a
condition of community placement or community custody, may
suspend the person's community placement or community custody
status and arrest or cause the arrest and detention in total
confinement of the offender, pending the determination of the
secretary as to whether the violation has occurred. The
community corrections officer shall report to the secretary all
facts and circumstances and the reasons for the action of
suspending community placement or community custody status. A
violation of a condition of community placement or community
custody shall be deemed a violation of the sentence for purposes
of RCW 9.94A.631. The authority granted to community corrections
officers under this section shall be in addition to that set
forth in RCW 9.94A.631.
(2) Inmates, as defined in RCW 72.09.015, who have been
transferred to community custody and who are detained in a local
correctional facility are the financial responsibility of the
department of corrections, except as provided in subsection (3)
of this section. The community custody inmate shall be removed
from the local correctional facility, except as provided in
subsection (3) of this section, not later than eight days,
excluding weekends and holidays, following admittance to the
local correctional facility and notification that the inmate is
available for movement to a state correctional institution.
(3) The department may negotiate with local correctional
authorities for an additional period of detention; however, sex
offenders sanctioned for community custody violations under *RCW 9.94A.737(2) to a term of confinement shall remain in the local
correctional facility for the complete term of the sanction. For
confinement sanctions imposed under *RCW 9.94A.737(2)(a), the
local correctional facility shall be financially responsible. For confinement sanctions imposed under *RCW 9.94A.737(2)(b),
the department of corrections shall be financially responsible
for that portion of the sanction served during the time in which
the sex offender is on community custody in lieu of earned
release, and the local correctional facility shall be financially
responsible for that portion of the sanction served by the sex
offender after the time in which the sex offender is on community
custody in lieu of earned release. The department, in
consultation with the Washington association of sheriffs and
police chiefs and those counties in which the sheriff does not
operate a correctional facility, shall establish a methodology
for determining the department's local correctional facilities
bed utilization rate, for each county in calendar year 1998, for
offenders being held for violations of conditions of community
custody, community placement, or community supervision. For
confinement sanctions imposed under *RCW 9.94A.737(2) (c) or
(d), the local correctional facility shall continue to be
financially responsible to the extent of the calendar year 1998
bed utilization rate. If the department's use of bed space in
local correctional facilities of any county for confinement
sanctions imposed on offenders sentenced to a term of community
custody under *RCW 9.94A.737(2) (c) or (d) exceeds the 1998 bed
utilization rate for the county, the department shall compensate
the county for the excess use at the per diem rate equal to the
lowest rate charged by the county under its contract with a
municipal government during the year in which the use occurs.
[1999 c 196 § 9; 1996 c 275 § 4; 1988 c 153 § 5. Formerly RCW 9.94A.207.]
NOTES:
*Reviser's note: RCW 9.94A.737 was amended by 2007 c 483 § 305, changing subsection (2) to subsection (3).
Construction -- Short title -- 1999 c 196: See RCW 72.09.904 and 72.09.905.
Severability -- 1999 c 196: See note following RCW 9.94A.010.
Finding -- 1996 c 275: See note following RCW 9.94A.505.
Application -- 1996 c 275 §§ 1-5: See note following RCW 9.94A.505.
Effective date -- Application of increased sanctions -- 1988 c 153: See notes following RCW 9.94A.030.
RCW 9.94A.740
Community custody violators -- Arrest,
detention, financial responsibility. (Effective August 1, 2009.)
(1) When an offender is arrested pursuant to RCW 9.94A.716, the
department shall compensate the local jurisdiction at the office
of financial management's adjudicated rate, in accordance with
RCW 70.48.440.
(2) Inmates, as defined in RCW 72.09.015, who have been
transferred to community custody and who are detained in a local
correctional facility are the financial responsibility of the
department of corrections, except as provided in subsection (3)
of this section.
(3) For confinement sanctions imposed by the department
under RCW 9.94A.670, the local correctional facility shall be
financially responsible.
(4) The department, in consultation with the Washington
association of sheriffs and police chiefs and those counties in
which the sheriff does not operate a correctional facility, shall
establish a methodology for determining the department's local
correctional facilities bed utilization rate, for each county in
calendar year 1998, for offenders being held for violations of
conditions of community custody.
(5) Except as provided in subsections (1) and (2) of this
section, the local correctional facility shall continue to be
financially responsible to the extent of the calendar year 1998
bed utilization rate for confinement sanctions imposed by the
department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.737. If the department's use of
bed space in local correctional facilities of any county for such
confinement sanctions exceeds the 1998 bed utilization rate for
the county, the department shall compensate the county for the
excess use at the per diem rate equal to the lowest rate charged
by the county under its contract with a municipal government
during the year in which the use occurs.
[2008 c 231 § 22; 1999 c 196 § 9; 1996 c 275 § 4; 1988 c 153 § 5. Formerly RCW 9.94A.207.]
NOTES:
Intent -- Application -- Application of repealers -- Effective date -- 2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.
Severability -- 2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Construction -- Short title -- 1999 c 196: See RCW 72.09.904 and 72.09.905.
Severability -- 1999 c 196: See note following RCW 9.94A.010.
Finding -- 1996 c 275: See note following RCW 9.94A.505.
Application -- 1996 c 275 §§ 1-5: See note following RCW 9.94A.505.
Effective date -- Application of increased sanctions -- 1988 c 153: See notes following RCW 9.94A.030.