Construction Management Manual
Washington State Model Design and
Construction Management Manual
An Ounce of Prevention Kills Two Birds with One Stone
Contents
- Introduction
- Policies and Procedures
- Filing Systems and Checklists
- Before You Advertise
- Contract Documents
- Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models
Introduction
An ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure.
Thorough preparation makes its own luck. ~ Joe Poyer
One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence
is preparation.
- Arthur Ashe (1943-1993) U.S. tennis
player, AIDS spokesman
Very few climbers scale a new peak without thorough research, planning and preparation. Before they ever set foot on the mountain, they will have climbed it in their mind several times over, based on their own research and the experiences of other, successful climbers. Managing a construction contract is not usually as dramatic as mountain climbing, but these same principles apply. If your agency is organized and thoroughly prepared beforehand, you will have fewer problems during the contract.
Detailed, well-designed set of plans and contract documents and sufficient funds to cover the contract amount and a reasonable contingency allowance are basic necessities. Clear policy and procedure documents will provide both accountability and structure for the contract administration team. Team members must be both well-versed in technical aspects of infrastructure construction and familiar with agency procedures and construction administration principles.
Policies and Procedures
Policy and procedure documents need to:
- identify needs and allocate resources for administering construction contracts
- identify agency and consultant construction administration team members
- establish the relative authority and responsibilities of team members
- provide for delegation of authority and responsibilities to the construction administration team by elected officials, including levels of commitment authority
- establish procedures and processes for timely review and disposition of change orders, claims and field adjustments
- provide for decision making at the lowest level possible for change orders, claims and field changes
- establish timely and routine meetings with elected officials and/or oversight committees during construction
- establish timely and routine meetings between the Contractor and the construction administration team during construction
- provide for 'partnering' concept with the Contractor
- provide guidance for public relations efforts
- provide guidance for risk management issues
- establish report requirements, including frequency and formats
Construction Administration Plans
Links and references to sample construction and project administration plans from Issaquah and Port Angeles are included in Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models, as well as commitment authority documents from Poulsbo Puyallup and Issaquah. Definitions and procedures for change orders, field adjustments and contract time adjustments are included in Issaquah and Port Angles documents as well as a MRSC publication summarizing change order policies for a number of cities. Section 1-09.11:Disputes and Claims of the 1998 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction describes procedures to be followed when the contractor files a claim.
A more detailed discussion of procedures for claims, change orders, field adjustments and contract time changes is found in the section on Care and Feeding of Your Construction Contract. Each agency should have its own definitions and levels of approval authority for these items, but for illustration purposes, note the following from Issaquah (Note: 1992 version - may be different now):
Definitions
Change Order Item. A change order item is a change in the plans and detail sheets or changes in the scope of work which result in additional costs of more than $1,000 per adjustment. This also includes contractor claims and requests for extras or force account work. Additional contract time may or may not be required.
Field Adjustment. A field adjustment is a change in the plans and detail sheets and/or proposal quantities or minor changes in the scope of work which result in no additional costs or in additional costs of no more than $1,000 per adjustment. This does not include contractor claims for delay or requests for extras or force account work No additional contract time is required.
Contract Amount. For the purposes of awarding the contract and determining the amount of the performance and payment bonds, the contract amount, or total bid, is the summation of the products of the quantities shown in the proposal by the unit bid prices plus state sales tax or use tax, as applicable. Quantities shown on the proposal and contract forms are estimates only, given only as a basis for comparison of bids. Increases or decreases in the quantity of any bid item in relation to the proposal quantity will occur, based on conditions in the field. Also, quantities may change as a result of changes in the scope of work, as determined by the Public Works Department, Mayor and Council. The basis of payment is the actual quantity measured in the field, multiplied by the unit bid price of the item of work performed.
Contract Time. Each contract specifies a time of completion of the project, measured in either calendar days or working days from the date that the Notice to Proceed is issued. This time of completion is adjusted, based on weather conditions, weekly. In addition, changes in the scope of work of the project, changed conditions in the field, or delays by the City may be reasonable cause for extensions of contract time.
Approval Authority
Levels of commitment and authority for changes in the contract documents are established, as follows:
Mayor and City Council
The Mayor and City Council will approve all change order and field adjustment items when (if) the weekly estimate of total contract cost exceeds the total contract amount plus 50 percent of the allocated contingency amount. The Mayor and Council, of course, may authorize additional contingency or waive this provision. Change orders that result in cost reductions or savings will be 'credited' against the contingency amount. Regardless of the dollar amount, any change order that changes project functions or affects a policy directive of the Mayor and Council must be approved by the Mayor and Council.
Project Manager/Engineering Manager
Change order items and requests by the contractor for extras or force account work must be recommended by the Project Manager and approved by the Engineering Manager. Change order items resulting in additional costs of under $20,000 or requests by the contractor for extras or force account work costing under $20,000 must be approved by the Engineering Manager. When (if) the weekly estimate of total contract cost exceeds the total contract amount plus 50 percent of the allocated contingency amount, change order items and requests for extras or force account work must also be approved by the Mayor and Council. Extensions of contract time due to change order items shall be as approved by the Engineering Manager.
Project Inspector/Engineer
The Inspector, with the approval of the Project Engineer, shall have the authority to make field adjustments, except when (if) the weekly estimate of total contract cost exceeds the total contract amount plus 50 percent of the allocated contingency amount. These changes and adjustments shall be duly noted in the daily inspection reports and shown on the weekly estimate of total contract cost. The Project Engineer shall adjust the time of completion, based on weather conditions, and shall report the same to the Project Manager weekly.
Public Relations
Several excellent pointers for construction project public relations are found
in "Guarding
Against Customer Complaints" (
608kb) and "9
Ways to Kill Public Confidence in your Organization and How to Avoid Them."
(
702kb) While written specifically for LID-financed projects, Chapter
Two: Public Relations of the Washington State Local Improvement District
Manual, Fourth Edition, also has pointers on public relations.
Risk Management
Risk management for construction contracts can, theoretically, be as simple as making sure that the contractor has insurance in the amounts and types specified and has named the city or county as additional insured. Claims for damage to vehicles and property due to construction activities can then be referred directly to the contractor's insurance agent. In reality, risk management on a construction project is one of the project manager's trickiest tasks. In the event of a major accident, everyone gets sued, regardless of insurance and indemnification clauses and requirements. The trick is to be aware of the contractor's safety program compliance, traffic control plan adequacy and compliance, and general job site safety without appearing to direct the contractor's efforts.
Risk management provisions and insurance requirements for a construction contract must conform to the city or county's overall risk management program. For this reason, the agency's risk manager and attorney should review all contract documents in the very early stages of their development. Examples of model policies, reference documents, links to useful Web sites and a bibliography of MRSC Library publications are linked and referenced in Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models
Types and amounts of insurance that the contractor must have in force through the life of the contract are found in Section 1-07.18: Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance of the 1998 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction (WSDOT/APWA). This section has been modified extensively by Division 1-99 to apply to local agencies. Proposed modifications to be included in the 2000 Standard Specifications Division 1-99 are included here.This proposed section requires the contractor to provide insurance coverage three years beyond the end of the contract or termination. Because WSDOT and FHWA will not participate in the cost of this additional insurance coverage, the agency will have to identify these additional costs, if any, and not include them in grant reimbursement requests.
Filing Systems and Checklists
If you want to be invaluable to your agency, develop fool proof, easy to use filing systems and checklists for construction projects. Conversely, if you want people to question your ancestry, lose or misfile a critical document or overlook a minor, but important, step in the construction management process.
Checklists from WSDOT and Port Angeles are referenced and linked in Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models.Issaquah's Project Management Handbook combines flowcharts, checklists, assignment of responsibilities and sample documents. Checklists should allow for a date and project manager signoff at each step or item on the checklist. References to the file where the information is located may also be useful during project closeout. Adaptation of the sample checklists to agency procedures should include any permits or approvals required by the agency or by other city or county departments, as well as other local, state, and federal permits and approvals unique to the agency's location. WSDOT uses two checklists for documentation review, one initially and one as a follow-up.
Standard filing systems from Issaquah and Port Angeles are referenced and linked in Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models.Standard filing systems are most effective if all project team members are familiar with the system, but only one or two people actually file the documents. This should minimize mislaid files or mis-filed documents. Make sure that the exact, full file location information appears on each document. Useful also is list of documents that typically are to be placed in each file and pocket.
Between the checklists and standard filing system, there should be very little chance that an important piece of correspondence will get lost. Right? Murphy's Law has not been repealed, however. Many agencies keep a master log of correspondence received and sent, by either department or project. This log should always document the date received or sent, the originator of the correspondence and to whom it was addressed. Other things that can be shown on the log include the project number, file location, date and file location of reply, and a `tickler' for the due date for the reply. An electronic version of such a correspondence log will allow fast and easy searches. There are also several correspondence and file management software packages available, of varying price and complexity.
Before You Advertise
If your agency is like most, by the time you are ready to advertise, everyone is champing at the bit and wondering why the project is not completed already. The last thing you want to hear is a suggestion that you stop and make one last check on everything before you advertise. But, that's exactly what this section is all about. Even a 'California'-style rolling stop, where you never lose momentum, will be helpful.
In larger agencies, there may be a completely different group that awards and administers the contract. In smaller jurisdictions, award and construction management is likely to be accomplished by the same people who managed the design. Even if your agency uses checklists faithfully, a final check of potential pitfalls and fatal flaws may prevent confusion and claims for delay. Have someone relatively unfamiliar with the project go through the contract documents and files and answer these questions:
- Have all required permits and approvals been obtained? Of those permits
and approvals not yet obtained, are there any which will prevent the contractor
from beginning work on the contract soon after the probable notice of award
date?
- Has all required right-of-way been purchased? Have all permanent and/or
temporary construction easements been obtained? If not, is there a danger
that the contractor may not be able to construct a critical portion of the
project within the anticipated schedule?
- Has the project design incorporated ADA requirements? A requirement for
handicapped ramps at intersections and other ADA requirements may be triggered
even if the project is an overlay of existing streets or otherwise seemingly
innocuous.
- Have all potentially affected utilities been contacted? Is there evidence
that the project designers went the proverbial `extra mile' to identify and
resolve potential conflicts between existing utilities and those to be constructed
as part of the project? Are there any potential `fatal flaw" conflicts
in the overall project design that could lead to redesign and claims for delay?
- Are federal funds being used for the project? While I-600 has eliminated
M/W/DBE requirements in state and locally funded projects, these requirements
may still exist for projects receiving direct federal funding. Similarly,
federal prevailing wage requirements are different than state requirements.
Both sets of requirements have to be followed on the project. Do the contract
documents include these?
- Are the quantities and construction cost estimates reasonable? Have they
been independently calculated and/or reviewed by someone other than the person
who did the original calculations. Experienced estimators know that there
are some quantity takeoffs, such as paving materials, that defy exact and
neat calculations and may need a certain amount of contingency for realistic
estimates.
- Are there any obvious errors, inconsistencies or confusing details on the plans or in other contract documents?
Contract Documents
Each set of contract documents is unique, tailored by the contracting agency to the needs of a specific project of a given size and complexity at a specific location. All sets of contract documents for competitively bid projects however, contain all or most of several components, including:
|
Contract |
Proposal |
Addenda |
|
Plans |
Standard Plans and Details |
Special Provisions |
|
General Provisions |
Standard Specifications |
Certificates |
|
Affidavits |
Performance Bond |
Change Orders |
|
Information for Bidders |
Advertisement for Bids |
Subsurface Boring Logs (if any) |
Section 1-04.2, Coordination of Contract Documents, Plans, Special Provisions Specifications, and Addenda of the 1998 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction states:
- Addenda,
- Proposal Form,
- Special Provisions,
- Contract Plans,
- Amendments to the Standard Specifications,
- Standard Specifications, and
- Standard Plans.
"The complete contract includes these parts: the contract form, bidder's completed proposal form, contract plans, contract provisions, standard specifications, standard plans, addenda, various certifications and affidavits, supplemental agreements, change orders, and subsurface boring logs (if any). These parts complement each other in describing a complete work. Any requirement in one part binds as if stated in all parts. The Contractor shall provide any work or materials clearly implied in the contract even if the contract does not mention it specifically.
Any inconsistency in the parts of the contract shall be resolved by following this order of precedence (e.g., 1 presiding over 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; 2 presiding over 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and so forth):
On the contract plans, working drawings, and standard plans, figured dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions.
This order of precedence shall not apply when work is required by one part of the contract but omitted from another part or parts of the contract. The work required in one part must be furnished even if not mentioned in other parts of the contract.
If any part of the contract requires work that does not include a description for how the work is to be performed, the work shall be performed in accordance with standard trade practice(s). For purposes of the contract, a standard trade practice is one having such regularity of observance in the trade as to justify an expectation that it will be observed by the Contractor in doing the work.
In case of any ambiguity or dispute over interpreting the contract, the Engineer's decision will be final as provided in Section 1-05.1."
The City of Kennewick has a similar provision in Section 1-4, Conflict of Documents, of its General Provisions:
"In the event of any conflicting provisions or requirements between the component parts of this contract, the component parts shall take precedence in the following order:
|
1. The Contract |
7. Information to Bidders |
|
2. Change Orders |
8. SWSS* |
|
3. Addenda |
9. Plans |
|
4. Special Provisions |
10. Proposal |
|
5. City of Kennewick Standard Specifications and Details |
11. Performance Bond |
|
6. General Provisions |
12. Advertisement for Bids |
|
*State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, Latest Edition |
|
As a final check before you go out to bid, check your contract document set to male sure that all components required by the size and complexity of the project are included. Also check to make sure there is an order of precedence clause similar to those above.
Reference Documents, City/County Codes, and Models
Construction Administration Plans and/or Commitment Authorities- City
of Tacoma Municipal Code, Chapter 1.06.241 - 1.06.275 (
645kb)
- Public
Works Construction Contract Change Order Procedure Survey (
110kb)
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Policy and Procedures Manual: PW-402 Project Administration
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Policy and Procedures Manual: PW-407 Competitive Bidding Procedures
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Policy and Procedures Manual: PW-404 Change Orders on Construction Projects
- Poulsbo Resolution # 960, which authorizes the Mayor to execute and then accept certain construction contracts
- Issaquah Administrative Manual
Section 302-1: Commitment Authority, 1990 (
148kb)
- Puyallup Purchasing Policies
and Procedures: Quick Reference Sheet, 1993 (
51kb)
- Issaquah SE 56th Street Road and Bridge Improvement Project Construction Administration Plan
Public Relations
- "Guarding
Against Customer Complaints," by Susan Hall and Ellen G. Miller,
Opflow, AWWA, May 1999. (
608kb) Reprinted from Opflow, Vol. 25, No. 5 (May 1999), by permission.
Copyright © 1999, American Water Works Association.
- "9
Ways to Kill Public Confidence in your Organization and How to Avoid Them.",
(
702kb) Becker & Penny, Environmental Achievement, Summer, 1996
(need to get permission)
- Chapter Two: Public Relations of the Washington State Local Improvement District Manual, Fourth Edition, MRSC, APWA, AWC, October, 1996
Risk Management
- Washington Municipal Clerks' Association Municipal Clerks' Handbook: Title V - Claims, Summons, Insurance and Risk Management.
- Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI) - provides links to a variety of risk management organizations.
- Public Risk Management Association
(PRIMA)
PRIMA Manuals and Books include:-
Public Sector Risk Management Manual
Managing Public Agency Risk: Creative Approaches, Vols. I and II
Insurance Requirements in Contracts: A Procedure Manual
1991-92 Risk Financing Survey
Risk Management for Small Communities (3 manuals: Risk Management Manual, Risk Management Workbook, Risk Reduction Techniques handbook) - Clark County Code, Ch. 2.95: Risk Management
- King County Code, ch. 4.12: Claims Against County
- Port Angeles Municipal Code Ch. 2.68: Risk Management and Safety
- Bibliography
of MRSC Library resources regarding Risk Management and Insurance
[Note: Clicking on this link will take you to a list of documents available on loan through the MRSC library.]
Filing Systems and Checklists
- Local Agency
Guidelines (WSDOT): Appendix 14.52 - Project Development Checklist
(
878kb)
- Port Angeles Public Works Department: Project Development Checklist
- Issaquah Public Works Department Project Management Handbook, October
1997 [Complete document is available on loan from MRSC Library or download
flowcharts and checklists only from link below].
- Project Manager's Manual- 1
(
113kb)
- Project Manager's Manual- 2
(
93kb)
- Project Manager's Manual- 3 (
190kb)
- Project Manager's Manual- 1
(
- Issaquah Public Works Department Standard Filing Systems
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Standard File Outline
- Contract
Materials Checklist, WSDOT Construction Inspector's Training Manual, November
1993 (
82kb)
- Initial Documentation
Review, WSDOT Construction Manual, 1997 (
108kb)
- Follow-Up Documentation
Review, WSDOT Construction Manual, 1997 (
113kb)
- Preconstruction
Communication Checklist, WSDOT Construction Manual, 1997 (
75kb)
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Policy PW-101 Letters and Memos
- Port Angeles Public Works Department Letter Log form
- Port
Angeles Public Works Department Policy PW-103 Records Management - Microfilming
- Available on loan from the MRSC Library:
-
City of Kennewick - Canal Drive Sidewalks: 99-15 DPW, July 1999
- City of Kennewick - Morain Street Reconstruction: 99-11 DPW, June 1999
- City of Kennewick - Standard Specifications and Details, 1999
- Klickitat County contract document set
- City of Auburn contract document set
- City of Issaquah - Contract Documents for Stationmasters House, 1996
- City of Issaquah - 1995 Maintenance Overlay Project: Contract 95-B, 1995
The Library has sample contract documents sets for building construction and remodeling projects as well.
-

