Infill Development: Completing the Community Fabric
Contents
- Introduction
- Authority, Statutes
- Guidebooks
- Articles, Briefs, Fact Sheets
- Barriers to Infill Development
- Infill Development Plans, Programs & Strategies
- Ordinances
- Incentives to Facilitate Infill Development
- Funding Resources, Costs
- Design for Infill Compatibility
- Special Types of Infill Housing
- Illustrative Examples, Case Studies
- Infill Studies, Capacity
- Brownfields & Brownfield Development
Introduction
Communities across the country are increasingly recognizing that the spread out patterns of growth, which have shaped American communities for the past several decades, cannot be sustained. Problems of increased traffic congestion, overstretched public facilities and increased infrastructure costs, loss of open space and other valued community resources, and even reduced physical activity and community health are typically associated with such patterns. Instead, an increased emphasis on developing passed-over parcels within developed areas, and on maximizing use of existing public facilities is needed. Many Washington communities have adopted urban growth boundaries that restrict the amount of land outside of urban centers that is available for urban development. The reduced land supply has created new interest in infill development opportunities in central and suburban cities alike.
Infill development is the process of developing vacant or under-used parcels within existing urban areas that are already largely developed. Most communities have significant vacant land within city limits, which, for various reasons, has been passed over in the normal course of urbanization. Ideally, infill development involves more than the piecemeal development of individual lots. Instead, a successful infill development program should focus on the job of crafting complete, well-functioning neighborhoods. Successful infill development is characterized by overall residential densities high enough to support improved transportation choices as well as a wider variety of convenience services and amenities. It can return cultural, social, recreational and entertainment opportunities, gathering places, and vitality to older centers and neighborhoods. Attention to design of infill development is essential to ensure that the new development fits the existing context, and gains neighborhood acceptance. A cooperative partnership between government, the development community, financial institutions, non-profit organizations, neighborhood organizations and other resources is essential to achieve infill success. In the long view, the public and private costs of continuing to favor sprawl development patterns will far exceed the resources needed now to facilitate infill development.
Authority, Statutes
- Ch 36.70A, RCW - The Growth Management Act
- RCW 43.21C.299 Infill development - categorical exemptions from chapter (SEPA)
- Ch. 35.100, RCW - Downtown and neighborhood commercial districts (sales and use tax increment financing)
Guidebooks
- Infill Development - Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods, Susan C. Enger, MRSC Report No. 38, June 1997 - and Appendices
- The Infill and Redevelopment Code Handbook, Transportation and Growth Management Program, Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, September 1999
- Managing Maryland's Growth: Models and Guidelines for Infill Development, 2001
- Strategies for Successful Infill Development, Northeast Midwest Institute, Congress for the New Urbanism
- Building Livable Communities: A Policymaker's Guide to Infill Development, The Center for Livable Communities, Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA, August 1995 (available for purchase)
- Smart Infill: Creating More Livable Communities in the Bay Area - A Guide for Bay Area Leaders, Stephen Wheeler, Greenbelt Alliance, San Francisco Bay Area, 2002 - or download.
- Small Scale Ground Oriented Residential Infill, city of Edmonton, Canada
Articles, Briefs, Fact Sheets
- Filling in the Spaces: Ten Essentials for Successful Urban Infill Housing (under index, select special reports)
- Urban Infill Housing: Myth and Fact, Urban Land Institute, 2001
- Best Practices to Encourage Infill Development, Prepared by Robinson & Cole for National Association of Realtors, December 2002
- Infill in the marketplace: alternatives to sprawl, by Tom Sargent, On The Ground, Fall 1994, 6 pages -
- Accommodating Growth Through Infill Development, Washington Research Council, 2001
- Filling in the Blanks, Michelle Lerner, Real Estate Portfolio - July/August 2002
- Refilling Colorado, Planning, APA
- Fixing It First: Targeting Infrastructure Investments to Improve State Economies and Invigorate Existing Communities, National Governor's Association Center for Best Practices, 2004
Barriers to Infill Development
If communities are to succeed in promoting infill development, they will need to recognize and overcome impediments to such development. Neighborhood opposition, financing challenges, inflexible building code and development regulations, lengthy permit processes, substandard infrastructure, difficult land assembly, site contamination and other conditions may need to be addressed to attract infill development
- Infill Development in the San Francisco Bay Area: Current Obstacles and Responses, Stephen M. Wheeler, Ph.D., AICP, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley, A Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Cleveland, Ohio, November 2001
- The Barriers to Using Urban Infill Development to Achieve Smart Growth, J. Terrence Farris, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 12, Issue 1, Fannie Mae Foundation, 2001 - Summary.
Infill Development Plans, Programs, Strategies & Tools
- Infill Development Plan, Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition
- Toolkit of Best Practices - Infill Development Program, Georgia Quality Growth Partnership
- Infill Program, Lake Oswego, OR
- Infill Strategy, Sacramento, CA (including financial incentives, streamlined procedure, flexible standards and target infill areas) May 14, 2002
- Infill Program, Sacramento, CA
- Residential Infill Strategy, Riverside, CA
- Residential Infill Summary: Infill Property Locator, Riverside, CA
- Infill housing: be a "good neighbor", Burnaby, B.C., Canada, (guidance for limiting impacts of infill construction on neighbors)
- Request for Proposals, Solicitation Number RFP - MRA-04-02, Trumbull Village Infill Housing Project, Albuquerque, NM (Albuquerque looks for creative, capable infill developers for infill sites)
Ordinances
- Oregon, Model Infill Ordinance,Transportation and Growth Management Program
- Maryland, Ch. V: Model Infill Ordinance, Department of Planning
- Lake Oswego, OR Ordinance No. 2333, adopted 2003
- Vancouver, WA Municipal Code, Ch. 20.920, Infill Development Standards
- Battle Ground, WA Municipal Code, Ch. 17.137, Infill Residential Development
- Sultan, WA Unified Development Code, Ch. 16.24, Standards for Infill Development in Residential Areas
- Tacoma, WA Municipal Code, Ch. 13.06.145, Supplemental provisions for single family residential development - in Title 13
- Seattle, WA Municipal Code, Ch. 23.43, Residential Small Lot Zone
- Clark County, WA Code, Ch. 40.260.110 - Residential Infill
- Clark County, WA Infill Development Handout #46, Revised 6/04/07
- Phoenix, AZ Infill Housing Program Development Standards
- Phoenix, AZ Zoning Ordinance, Ch. 6, sec. 630 - Residential Infill R-I District, Multifamily Residential
- Austin, TX Land Development Code, Ch. 25-2 Zoning, Subchapter D, Ch. 25-2-1401 through Ch. 25-2-1604
- Portland, OR Zoning Code, Ch. 33.405 - Alternative Design Density Overlay Zone and sec. 33.110.240 - Alternative Development Options (duplex on corner lots and other potentially useful infill options)
- Portland OR, Infill Design
- Lacey, WA Ordinance No. 1218 related to residential infill, 2004
Incentives to Facilitate Infill Development
Many communities are using incentives to make infill more attractive and affordable to developers by addressing impediments to infill development such as those described above.
- Infill Incentives, Policy Link
- Riverside, CA Infill Development Incentives (See Fee Adjustments and Cost Avoidances)
- Phoenix, AZ Infill Housing Program Incentives
- Phoenix, AZ Infill Housing Program (how to qualify and apply for incentives program)
- San Mateo County, CA Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Incentive Program, City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (Winner of EPA Smart Growth Achievements Award, 2002)
- Austin, TX Smart Growth Incentives
- Sacramento, CA Code, Title 17, Div. VI, Ch. 17.191 - Reductions in Development and Impact Fees to Promote Infill Development in Target Residential Infill Areas
- Arizona Legislature HB2301 - 421R - I Ver - sales tax rebate; infill housing
- Sacramento, CA Vacant Lot Development Program and Boarded and Vacant Homes Program
- Miami-Dade County, FL Infill Housing Initiative (recycling abandoned lots)
- California Bay Area Looking to Transportation Funds as Infill Housing Leverage
- San Diego, CA Expedite Program for Affordable/In-Fill Housing & Sustainable Buildings, Information Bulletin 538
Funding Resources, Costs
- Planning Grants, Better Urban Infill (BUILD) Program, Dane County, WI (program provides grants to Dane County municipalities to support planning that leads to infill development, downtown revitalization)
- Financing Brownfield Redevelopment, Georgia Quality Growth Partnership
Design for Infill Compatibility
Infill development design guidelines are useful tools for ensuing that the new development fits the existing context, and gains neighborhood acceptance. It is not uncommon for existing residents to resist new development within a neighborhood, particularly true when motivated by past bad experiences with new development, which failed to fit existing neighborhood character. Design guidelines in general can help assure more aesthetic development. Design guidelines that focus on infill development can guide the process of integrating new development carefully into the existing neighborhood fabric with respect to block patterns, scale, building features, landscaping, and other characteristics of the neighborhood.
- Portland, OR Infill Design Project (includes observations on infill design problems and potential solutions, and a design preferences citizen survey)
- Santa Rosa, CA Sec. 4.3: Infill Development Design Guidelines
- Overland, KS Infill and Redevelopment Design Guidelines (including multi-family and commercial infill guidelines)
- MRSC Webpage: Design Review Guidelines and Code Provisions
Special Types of Infill Housing and Supporting Services
- Austin, TX Neighborhood Plan Combining District Options For Neighborhood Planning Areas, Infill Special Use Options Booklet (The city provides for a set of options that may be used for small lot amnesty/infill areas, including cottage housing, "urban homes," secondary apartments, neighborhood mixed use building, residential infill, neighborhood centers, and corner stores)
- Nanaimo, B.C. Innovative Housing for Neighbourhoods: Triplex and Quadruplex Infill Design Guidelines
- Toronto, Ontario Infill Townhouses (Design Guidelines)
- Tucson, AZ Mixed Use Development Prototype
- MRSC Web page, Cottage Housing
Illustrative Examples/Case Studies
- Lowry Redevelopment Creates $4 Billion Economic Benefit, Metro Denver Redevelopment Corporation
- Feature Projects, Better Urban Infill (BUILD) Program, Dane County WI, and Dane County Redevelopment Case Studies
- Ground-Oriented Medium-Density Housing - Infill and Small Lot, Greater Vancouver Regional District (Best practice examples of small lot, duplex, cluster, row housing and other housing types; Includes specifications)
Infill Studies - Capacity
Many communities in Washington and other states are analyzing the capacity of potential infill sites to accommodate new growth as and alternative to sprawl development. Washington State has established a Buildable Lands program that requires certain high growth counties and cities to monitor land supply within urban growth areas. These jurisdictions analyze vacant, underutilized and partially used land to estimate land supply available to accommodate anticipated growth within the UGA.
- Report on the Residential Refill Study for 97 - 98, January 2000, Prepared by Sonny Conder, Portland Metro (This report studies the rate of residential refill. Refill consists of infill and redevelopment)
- Infill Capacity Analysis of Orange County and Western Riverside County Gateway, Produced by the Center for Demographic Research at California State University, Fullerton for Western Riverside Council of Governments and Orange County Council of Governments Interregional Partnership, April 2004 (Study identifies candidate infill/refill housing sites, especially in transit rich and employment rich areas. Uses assessed improvement-to-land value ratios)
- Estimating the Housing Infill Capacity of the Bay Area, Juan Onesimo Sandoval and John D. Landis, (October 1, 2000). Institute of Urban & Regional Development. IURD Working Paper Series. Paper WP-2000-06
- Clark County Buildable Lands Report, 2002
- Kitsap County Updated Lands Capacity Analysis for Urban Residential Lands
- Recommended Methodology and Work Program for a Buildable Lands Analysis for Snohomish County and its Cities
- City of Bellingham Urban Growth Area - Land Supply Analysis Summary
- Pierce County Buildable Lands Report, 2002
- King County Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002: Recent Growth & Land Capacity in King County & its Cities

