Performance Measurement
Contents
- Overview
- Organizations
- Articles, Papers and Reports
- Washington Local Government
- Out-of-State
- Performance Measures by Functional Area
Overview
This Web page is intended as a resource for Washington local government elected officials, managers and staff who are developing and implementing performance measurement systems.
Why Measure Performance?
The use of performance measures in local government is being driven by increased citizen demands for government accountability, greater interest on the part of local legislators in performance related information to assist in program evaluation and resource allocation decisions, and the efforts of various organizations and professional associations to make governments more results-oriented.
Performance measurement allows policy makers, managers, and citizens to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of government services. Performance measures include inputs (resources used), outputs (program activities), efficiency measures (ratio of inputs to outputs), and outcomes (the actual results of programs and services). Many performance measurement systems are limited to measuring program inputs and outputs. Ideally, however, performance measurement efforts will also generate information about program results and outcomes.
Supporting Organizations
Performance measurement is supported and encouraged by a number of organizations and professional associations, including the International City/County Management Association, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, and the Government Finance Officers Association.
The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) supports performance measurement research and development through their Center for Performance Measurement. The program provides on-site training in performance measurement concepts and data collection techniques and access to a database of comparative performance information from participating city and county governments. Several Washington cities and one county (Bellevue, Bothell, Burien Clyde Hill, Kent, Kirkland, Lynnwood, Medina, Mercer Island, Redmond, Renton, Richland, Sammamish, Shoreline, Tacoma, University Place, Kitsap County, Vancouver) have joined in ICMA's performance measurement program.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has been promoting performance measurement since the early 1980's. In 1990, GASB began publishing a series of research reports on "Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting" to assist governments with the development of performance measures. In 1994 the GASB issued Concepts Statement No. 2, stating that "service efforts and accomplishments information - including both financial and nonfinancial performance measures - is an essential aspect of the measurement of governmental performance and is necessary for assessing accountability and making informed decisions."
Since 1997, GASB's research has been funded by grants from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The objective of this project is to encourage use and reporting of performance measures and, based on their use, to determine whether performance measures have developed to the point where the GASB will consider establishing service efforts and accomplishments (SEA) reporting standards or guidelines for inclusion in the general purpose external financial reports.
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends that program and service performance measures be developed and used as an important component of long term strategic planning and decision making which should be linked to governmental budgeting.
Organizations
- International City/County Management Association - Center for Performance Measurement
- Governmental Accounting Standards Board - Performance Measurement for Government
- Government Finance Officer's Association - Performance Management: Using Performance Measurement for Decision Making (2002) - Updated Performance Measures (
66Kb) (1994) (GFOA recommended practice)
- The National Center for Public Procudtivity, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Campus at Newark - Citizen-Driven Government Performance Project
- National Academy for Public Administration - Performance Management Consortium
- Fund for the City of New York - Center on Municipal Government Performance
- National Governor's Association - Best Practices in Managing for Results
- Performance Measurement Association - a global network for those interested in the theory and practice of performance measurement and management.
Articles, Papers and Reports
- Performance Indicators - Getting Started, National Academy of Public Administration, Center for Improving Government Performance, October 2002, (
98Kb)
- Guide to Performance Measure Management, (
660Kb) 2000 Edition, State of Texas
- Performance Measures Best Practices - National Performance Review, June 1997.
- Linking Performance Measures to Resource Allocation," (
1Kb) Philip B. Scheps, Government Finance Review, June 2000
- Performance Measurement: The Link to Effective Government, (
57Kb) Government Finance Officers Association, Research Bulletin, April 1994
- GASB State and Local Government Case Studies - As a part of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s (GASB) long-term performance measurement project, during 1999 the GASB's researchers conducted intensive interviews in 26 state and local governments across the country.
- Open Memorandum to: Government Executives, From: Executive Session on Public Sector Performance Management, Re: Get Results through Performance Management - State/Local Edition (
268Kb) - Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, June 2001.
- "The Problem with Promises," Alan Ehrenhalt, Governing Magazine, January 2002.
- Selected MRSC Library Holdings - Performance Measurement. [Note: Clicking on this link will take you to a list of documents available on loan through the MRSC library.]
- Primer on Performance Measurement, - U.S. Office of Management and Budget, February 28, 1995.
- A Brief Guide for Performance Measurement in Local Government - National Center for Public Productivity, Rutgers University.
- Case Studies - National Center for Public Productivity, Rutgers University - Narratives of citizen-driven initiatives that involve citizens in the measurement of government performance.
- "Implementing Performance Measures," Liane Levetan, American City & County, Sep 1, 2000
- "Performance Measurement and Pain," Jonathan Walters, Governing Magazine, June 1997 - As performance measurement sweeps through state and local government, a lot of managers are finding themselves having to do a lot of explaining.
- The Oregon Option: Early Lessons from a Performance Partnership on Building Results-Driven Accountability -Barbara Dyer, Partner, The Public's Work for The Alliance for Redesigning Government of the National Academy of Public Administration, July 1996. This report was developed to "describe the evolving concept of accountability for results that are crucial to the Oregon Option."
- Managing for Results - Analytic Challenges in Measuring Performance (
405Kb) - U.S. General Accounting Office, May 1997. - Performance Measurement: The Link to Effective Government, (
Washington Local Governments
Bellevue
- 2005 Performance Measures Survey, (
810Kb)City of Bellevue, January 2006
- 2005 Annual Performance Report, (
5.6Mb) City of Bellevue, June 2006
- 2004 Comparative Cities Performance Report, (
1.6Mb) City of Bellevue, January 2006
- 2002 Performance Measures Report (
6166Kb) - City of Bellevue, August 2002
- 2001 Comparative Cities Performance Report (
7.65Mb)- City of Bellevue, July 2003
- 2000 Bellevue ICMA Comparative Cities Performance Report - City of Bellevue, November 2001
- 2001 Performance Scorecards (
232Kb) - City of Bellevue, April 2001
Kent
- 2002 Performance Measurements (
165Kb)
- 2001 Performance Measurement Report (
221Kb)
Kirkland
Lynnwood
- Annual Performance Report (
570Kb) - City of Lynnwood, May 2003
- Chapter 2.70, Lynnwood Municipal Code, "Performance Measurement and Results"
- The National Citizen's Survey 2002 - Report of Normative Comparisons for the City of Lynnwood, Washington
(
413Kb) - National Research Center, Inc., August 2002
- The National Citizen's Survey - Report of Results for the City of Lynnwood, Washington (
1.08 Mb) - National Research Center, Inc., August 2002
King County
- Performance Measurement Web page
- King County Benchmark Report (for implementation of county-wide planning policies)
Out-of-State
Austin, Texas
- 2000 City of Austin Community Scorecard - The 2000 City of Austin Community Scorecard provides information on how the City is delivering services in four major categories: Public Safety; Youth, Family and Neighborhood Vitality; Sustainable Community; and Affordability.
Charlotte County, Virginia
- Performance Management and Strategic Planning
- FY 2003 Year End Corporate Performance Report (
2520KB)
Denver, Colorado
Fairfax County, Virginia
- Performance Measurement - provides information about its performance system and indicators
- Basic Manual for Performance Measurement (
877Kb)
- Data Collection for Performance Measurement Manual (
202Kb)
- Surveying for Customer Satisfaction Manual (
169Kb)
- Managing For Results (Advanced) Manual (
346Kb)
- Performance Measurement Matters - a quarterly newsletter.
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
- Performance Measurement - City of Grande Prairie of Alberta, Canada
Kansas City Metropolitan Area
- Kansas City Metro Performance Measurement Pilot Project
- Consultant RFP
- Data Collection Template - Spread sheet document
Maricopa County, Arizona
- Managing for Results - Strategic Plans and Performance Measures
North Carolina
Orange County, Florida
Phoenix, Arizona
- Managing for Results (
143KB)
- City Manager Executive Report (performance indicator report)
Portland, Oregon
- Service Efforts and Accomplishments: 2002-03 (
3783KB) (Thirteenth Annual Report on City Government Performance)
- Portland Multnomah Progress Board - Reports on Multnomah County and City of Portland community indicators
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Performance Measures by Functional Area
- "Recommended Service Reporting Indicators for City Clerks," David N. Ammons, "Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards," Sage Publications, 1997, pp. 35, 36-40.
- "Recommended Service Efforts And Accomplishments (Sea) Reporting Indicators For Economic Development," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity.
- City of Kirkland - 2006 "Information Technology" Performance Measures
- "Eight Steps To Develop and Use IT Performance Measures Effectively," U.S. General Services Administration - This guide to help those who want to gain a further understanding of performance measurement and for those who develop and use performance measures for information technology (IT) projects.
- "Guide to Technology Performance Measurement's Essential Ingredient," by Christopher Swope, Governing Magazine, April 1998 - For a decade, New York City's parks and recreation department sent inspectors into parks to rate them.
- "Law Enforcement Tech Guide for Creating Performance Measures That Work - A Guide for Executives and Managers," U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2006 (
1641Kb)
- City of Kirkland - 2006 "Police" Performance Measures
- "Recommended Service Efforts and Accomplishment (SEA) Reporting Indicators for Police," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity
- "Electronic Roadmap for Evaluation - Performance Measures," Bureau of Justice Assistance
- "Measuring Performance," The Police Organization In Transition, Section F, Community Policing Consortium, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
- Police & Law Enforcement Performance Standards and Levels of Service - MRSC
- "Police Levels of Service," (
35Kb) from Level of Service Standards - Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Community Life, MRSC, Report 50,1994
- "Performance Measures - What Works," (
88.5Kb) U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Fact Sheet, December 1998, #71
- "Measuring What Matters Part One: Measures of Crime, Fear, and Disorder. National Institute of Justice," (
139Kb) Research in Action, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, December 1996
- "Measuring What Matters Part Two: Developing Measures of What the Police Do," (
259Kb) Research in Action, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, November 1997
- City of Kirkland - 2006 "Parks" Performance Measures
- "Recommended Service Efforts And Accomplishments (SEA) Reporting Indicators For Parks And Recreation," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity
- "Recommended Service Efforts and Accomplishments (SEA) Reporting Indicators For Public Health," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity
Risk Management
- "Benchmarking, Best Practices, and Performance Measurements for Public Entity Risk Management Guidelines," (
66Kb) Colorado Chapter of the Public Risk Management Association, November 1999
Streets, Roads, Traffic
- City of Kirkland - 2006 "Highways and Roads" Performance Measures
- "Recommended Service Efforts and Accomplishments (SEA) Reporting Indicators For Road Maintenance," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity
- "Recommended Service Efforts And Accomplishments (SEA) Reporting Indicators For Street Sweeping," Citizen-Driven Government Performance, The National Center for Public Productivity

